Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   WI Union-busting provisions added in budget committee (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=42541)

Riot 06-22-2011 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 786156)
and you presume the police were left out of the bill

:zz: No, I don't. What I said has nothing at all to do with the bill. Zero. Can't you follow the thread?

Riot 06-22-2011 02:59 PM

Tea Party and GOP ex-senator attack protestors in Capitol
 
Yeah, this is really nice. What a bunch of complete effing losers these three are - and the guy in the wheelchair was a former elected state Republican official. Intolerant, hate-filled idiots - like the idiots following Rand Paul who threw to the ground and attacked the girl holding the sign they didn't like.

Plenty of Facebook accounts of this attack, and video out there on internet

Quote:

Protester punched in the face at daily Capitol singalong
http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/loc...cc4c03286.html

Among them, Reeder said, was former Republican state Sen. Dave Zien of Eau Claire, who was yelling and running over singers' belongings in the wheelchair he now uses following a motorcycle accident.

A participant in the daily, non-violent Solidarity Sing Along at the state Capitol suffered a broken tooth when he was punched in the face by one of two men who were draping a "Don't Tread on Me" flag over the heads of singers, the leader of the sing-along said.

Henry C. Rahr of Green Bay was arrested on a tentative charge of battery, and another man holding the flag, Eugene C. German, of Shorewood, Minn., also was cited for disorderly conduct, Vigue said.

Riot 06-22-2011 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 786080)
In America everyone should be equally accountable for their own insurnace whatever the market dictates. To force someone to pay is a sin ;)

No, paying your taxes is not a "sin". We as a country choosing to take care of each other is not a "sin" in the least. You think that's a sin?

You want be a member of this society, that is the price of admission you choose if you want to be an American and live in this country. You don't like this country, move elsewhere. You want to stay here, you have your say like every other citizen does. You don't like something the majority, as a democratic republic, decides to do, tough luck. Get over it or move out.

dellinger63 06-22-2011 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 786189)
No, paying your taxes is not a "sin". We as a country choosing to take care of each other is not a "sin" in the least. You think that's a sin?

You want be a member of this society, that is the price of admission you choose if you want to be an American and live in this country. You don't like this country, move elsewhere. You want to stay here, you have your say like every other citizen does. You don't like something the majority, as a democratic republic, decides to do, tough luck. Get over it or move out.

No paying taxes is not a sin. America needs an Armed Forces, a Judicial System / Prison System and about the tenth of oversight committees it currently has. What the government does not need any business in is healthcare, retirement planning and unemployment. All should be handled privately on an individual basis, with private insurance either paid by the individual, employer or a combo of both.

You want someone to pay to subsidize your healthcare? Move to Canada. BTW the majority wants Obamacare repealed so I can't understand your arguement and it is no longer current? Get over it or move north.

Riot 06-22-2011 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 786221)
What the government does not need any business in is healthcare, retirement planning and unemployment. All should be handled privately on an individual basis, with private insurance either paid by the individual, employer or a combo of both.

LOL - we, the government, started those programs: retirement safety net, unemployment insurance, healthcare reform - because the private systems were woefully inadequate and American citizens were suffering

Quote:

BTW the majority wants Obamacare repealed ....
Nonsense. False. The majority think the few provisions in the insurance reform were inadequate, too little, and want more - including single payer.

Watch this (the whole thing): you agree with Rand Paul, I'd imagine http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYgVglm2xFY

dellinger63 06-23-2011 08:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 786449)

Nonsense. False. The majority think the few provisions in the insurance reform were inadequate, too little, and want more - including single payer.]

Just in case you want to cite something other than your imagination.

Quote:

Forty four percent of voters believe the health reform law should be repealed compared with 38 percent who do not, demonstrating a persisting thumbs down for Obamacare even after its initial measures – like guaranteeing insurance for those with pre-existing conditions and keeping young adults on their parents policies – have been rolled out.
http://www.whitehousedossier.com/201...care-repealed/

Quote:

Voters continue to support repeal of the national health care law and feel the new law will be bad for the country.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 53% of Likely Voters at least somewhat favor repeal of the health care law, while 42% at least somewhat oppose it. Those figures include 38% who Strongly Favor repeal and 27% who are Strongly Opposed. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

Support for repeal shows little change from a week ago. Most voters have supported repeal every week but one since Congress passed the law in March of last year, with that support running as high as 63%.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ...ealth_care_law

So deal with it

Riot 06-23-2011 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 786500)
So deal with it

It's not going to be repealed. It's the law. It's already in effect. So you deal with it ;)

wiphan 06-23-2011 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 786538)
It's not going to be repealed. It's the law. It's already in effect. So you deal with it ;)

I thought you said the majority of americans didn't want Obamacare repealed? You believed that what Dell said was nonsense or false. Obviously he supported that with facts. There will be 800,000+ jobs lost if Obamacare goes into effect. That should help improve the economy. :eek:

Riot 06-23-2011 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wiphan (Post 786576)
I thought you said the majority of americans didn't want Obamacare repealed? You believed that what Dell said was nonsense or false. Obviously he supported that with facts.

If you look at the polls from January 2011 (Rassmussen, even), it's completely opposite. If you look at the poller, it changes with the way the question is asked. When you ask people if they want more (single payer) it's yes.

Quote:

There will be 800,000+ jobs lost if Obamacare goes into effect. That should help improve the economy. :eek:
And your reference for that weirdness is? And btw, "Obamacare" is already in effect. It is in effect now, and has been for some time.

wiphan 06-23-2011 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 786583)
If you look at the polls from January 2011 (Rassmussen, even), it's completely opposite. If you look at the poller, it changes with the way the question is asked. When you ask people if they want more (single payer) it's yes.



And your reference for that weirdness is? And btw, "Obamacare" is already in effect. It is in effect now, and has been for some time.

Most provisions do not go into effect until 2014

Riot 06-23-2011 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wiphan (Post 786589)
Most provisions do not go into effect until 2014

What part of getting 30 million people better insurance and healthcare access is going to lose " 800,000+ " jobs?

wiphan 06-23-2011 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 786613)
What part of getting 30 million people better insurance and healthcare access is going to lose " 800,000+ " jobs?

What do you think is going to happen to all the people employed in the insurance industry? Estimates are that a minimum of 800,000 will lose their jobs if all the provisions go into effect by 2014. The insurance will not be better for most of us that already have decent insurance. The only reason you believe that is you are self employed and have to pay your own insurance. Having the government involved with something like your health is not a good thing. Have you ever dealt with a realtive on Medicare? The patients health is not what matters most

Riot 06-23-2011 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wiphan (Post 786614)
What do you think is going to happen to all the people employed in the insurance industry? Estimates are that a minimum of 800,000 will lose their jobs if all the provisions go into effect by 2014.

Um, no. There is no estimate whatsoever that "the insurance industry" will lose 800,000 jobs.

What was actually said, in the Congressional hearing that puts out the number you are quoting, where the CBO director spoke, was that 800,000 people, over the next 10 years, will no longer have to work just to afford their insurance, and that they may choose to not continue working.

Quote:

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/49273.html
By J. LESTER FEDER & KATE NOCERA 2/10/11

CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf told the House Budget Committee on Thursday that the health care law will reduce employment by 0.5 percent by 2021 because some people will no longer have to work just to afford health insurance.

“That means that if the reduction in the labor used was workers working the average number of hours in the economy and earning the average wage, that there would be a reduction of 800,000 workers,” Elmendorf said in an exchange with Rep. John Campbell (R-CA).

The report, published in August, said, "The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the legislation, on net, will reduce the amount of labor used in the economy by a small amount—roughly half a percent—primarily by reducing the amount of labor that workers choose to supply … That net effect reflects changes in incentives in the labor market that operate in both directions: Some provisions of the legislation will discourage people from working more hours or entering the workforce, and other provisions will encourage them to work more.”
It should also be noted that 800,000 no longer having to work just to afford insurance means ... insurance will cost less for them. A good thing.

Quote:

The insurance will not be better for most of us that already have decent insurance.
Most people won't experience a change in their insurance, but all will and already have experienced benefits. It is already better for everyone who is insured, as your insurance company will no longer be able to rescind you. You also no longer have a lifetime cap.

Two good things that affects everyone in a positive way.

Quote:

The only reason you believe that is you are self employed and have to pay your own insurance.
The benefits of the PPACA affect everyone, whether they are in a group at work or a group of self-employed. Nearly all the PPACA are simply consumer protections from private insurance companies. No "government takeover of health care".

Quote:

Having the government involved with something like your health is not a good thing.
They do a pretty damn good job with Medicare. So good, that I think Medicare should be offered to everyone.

Quote:

Have you ever dealt with a realtive on Medicare? The patients health is not what matters most
Yes, I do (both my parents) and those hoops are no different than what private insurance companies require - they are just specific to Medicare.
Another good thing from the PPACA is that it closes the donut hole for them. A big benefit.

nebrady 06-23-2011 05:35 PM

obama and riot approval dropping!
 
Check it out obama approval dropping. Maybe us will wake up and this spending to solve everything will end it doesn't work! As for the incident in capital its sad but isn't time for these protesters to go home! Wisconsin is fine and fact great! We have a governor willing to fix a budget thats been broken for a long time. Why don't yu come up riot go to summerfest next week and see for yourself. Protesters go to riots house she can listen to you sing! lol

Riot 06-23-2011 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nebrady (Post 786617)
Check it out obama approval dropping. Maybe us will wake up and this spending to solve everything will end it doesn't work! As for the incident in capital its sad but isn't time for these protesters to go home! Wisconsin is fine and fact great! We have a governor willing to fix a budget thats been broken for a long time. Why don't yu come up riot go to summerfest next week and see for yourself. Protesters go to riots house she can listen to you sing! lol

Here's a Politifact story about how Walker's budget increases your taxes over the next few years:

http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/...tax-increases/

wiphan 06-23-2011 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 786616)
Um, no. There is no estimate whatsoever that "the insurance industry" will lose 800,000 jobs.

What was actually said, in the Congressional hearing that puts out the number you are quoting, where the CBO director spoke, was that 800,000 people, over the next 10 years, will no longer have to work just to afford their insurance, and that they may choose to not continue working.


No that is not what I said. The insurance companies will see a substantial loss of employment period

It should also be noted that 800,000 no longer having to work just to afford insurance means ... insurance will cost less for them. A good thing.



Most people won't experience a change in their insurance, but all will and already have experienced benefits. It is already better for everyone who is insured, as your insurance company will no longer be able to rescind you. You also no longer have a lifetime cap.

Two good things that affects everyone in a positive way.


[b]Who is going to pay for these benefits. Yes they both sound great I agree but someone is going to foot the [b]

The benefits of the PPACA affect everyone, whether they are in a group at work or a group of self-employed. Nearly all the PPACA are simply consumer protections from private insurance companies. No "government takeover of health care".



They do a pretty damn good job with Medicare. So good, that I think Medicare should be offered to everyone.


Yes, I do (both my parents) and those hoops are no different than what private insurance companies require - they are just specific to Medicare.
Another good thing from the PPACA is that it closes the donut hole for them. A big benefit.

I agree with the donut hole thing, but Medicare is not better than my current insurance and definitely has some major issues

Riot 06-23-2011 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wiphan (Post 786620)
I agree with the donut hole thing, but Medicare is not better than my current insurance and definitely has some major issues

Medicare is worse than some, and better than some, private insurance policies. The point, and the reason it exists, is that it insures people (old, sick) that no private insurance company would. Medicare was created for a reason - and that reason (old sick people need insurance and private companies won't insure them) hasn't disappeared and will not.

I think buying into Medicare should be offered to any and all Americans. Don't declare a single payer, let the market decide.

Let private insurance companies compete with that offered plan, at that price.

That probably would lose thousands of insurance company jobs (which is why we don't have single payer in this country - the insurance company lobby)

PPACA is helping people that are not insured now. Why people who are insured hate that is beyond me - because we are currently paying, through our insurance and medical costs, for those uninsured now. I'd much rather they have insurance, get better medical care because they can afford it, and stop only being seen in crisis mode (expensive for us).

And the consumer protections for us who are insured are a good thing - not something to dislike. That's crazy!

Quote:

No that is not what I said. The insurance companies will see a substantial loss of employment period
How will the insurance companies will see a loss of employment? 30 million more people will now be insured by them (it's estimated 18 million additional have already been ensured) The private insurance companies certainly won't lose business, they are gaining it.

You'll notice the day the PPACA passed, insurance stocks went up - not down.

Cannon Shell 06-23-2011 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 786186)
Yeah, this is really nice. What a bunch of complete effing losers these three are - and the guy in the wheelchair was a former elected state Republican official. Intolerant, hate-filled idiots - like the idiots following Rand Paul who threw to the ground and attacked the girl holding the sign they didn't like.

Plenty of Facebook accounts of this attack, and video out there on internet

LOL

Yeah Unions are known for their peaceful tactics too

The guy ran over their "things" in his wheelchair?
Did he have some sort of monster truck wheels installed?
Are we sure this wasn't Roger after a few too many drinks?

Cannon Shell 06-23-2011 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 786189)
No, paying your taxes is not a "sin". We as a country choosing to take care of each other is not a "sin" in the least. You think that's a sin?

You want be a member of this society, that is the price of admission you choose if you want to be an American and live in this country. You don't like this country, move elsewhere. You want to stay here, you have your say like every other citizen does. You don't like something the majority, as a democratic republic, decides to do, tough luck. Get over it or move out.

I dont remember choosing to "take care of each other"?

I wasn't aware that this was put to a vote of the people of America. I seem to remember it as being done by politicians.

Cannon Shell 06-23-2011 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 786583)
If you look at the polls from January 2011 (Rassmussen, even), it's completely opposite. If you look at the poller, it changes with the way the question is asked. When you ask people if they want more (single payer) it's yes.



And your reference for that weirdness is? And btw, "Obamacare" is already in effect. It is in effect now, and has been for some time.

Was awfully hot today for January

pdrift1 06-24-2011 04:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell (Post 786628)
LOL

Yeah Unions are known for their peaceful tactics too

The guy ran over their "things" in his wheelchair?
Did he have some sort of monster truck wheels installed?
Are we sure this wasn't Roger after a few too many drinks?

hey chuck, hope all is well, been awhile. so are you trying to imply i'm a menace to society. you know i would be down on state st at the bar instead of wasting my time at the capitol running over liberal hippies "things". if i was there drunk i woulda took zien out and started a riot .:) rog

wheelchair demolition is a new sport ive been active in

hope you and paula and the kids are doing great. tell paula hi from us

now back to my bottle of pinot noir

dellinger63 06-24-2011 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pdrift1 (Post 786698)
hey chuck, hope all is well, been awhile. so are you trying to imply i'm a menace to society. you know i would be down on state st at the bar instead of wasting my time at the capitol running over liberal hippies "things". if i was there drunk i woulda took zien out and started a riot .:) rog

wheelchair demolition is a new sport ive been active in

hope you and paula and the kids are doing great. tell paula hi from us

now back to my bottle of pinot noir

:tro::tro:

dellinger63 06-24-2011 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 786538)
It's not going to be repealed. It's the law. It's already in effect. So you deal with it ;)

So is the Governor of Wisconsin yet you seem to be wet in your pants for any recall elections, and you don't even have a vote.

Yet repeal of Obamacare that I demonstrated thru polls, is not a desire of the majority, is untouchable law?

Hypocrisy? Of course, deal with it!

Riot 06-24-2011 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 786721)
So is the Governor of Wisconsin yet you seem to be wet in your pants for any recall elections, and you don't even have a vote.

Yet repeal of Obamacare that I demonstrated thru polls, is not a desire of the majority, is untouchable law?

Hypocrisy? Of course, deal with it!

LOL - hardly.

The health care law repeal attempt was voted upon earlier this year, and already failed.

The recalls in Wisconsin may fail, too. Or may pass.

Both are moving along their legal, constitutional channels as the voters want.

Nothing hypocritical about that at all, is there?

Yes, I'll be sending more money to Wisconsin Democrats, to help their repeal efforts. Glad to do it :tro:

Riot 06-24-2011 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell (Post 786630)
I dont remember choosing to "take care of each other"?

I wasn't aware that this was put to a vote of the people of America. I seem to remember it as being done by politicians.

Oh, you don't know how that works? We elect politicians to represent us based upon what they promise to do for us? All the Republicans and Democrats that have promised us health care over the years - in addition to Social Security, Medicare, etc. ?

Yeah, that was all done against the continuing will of the majority of American people over the past decades ;)

I'm still waiting to find out how the insurance industry will lose " 800,000+ jobs ", when they've already added an estimated 18 million to their insurance rolls, and will get up to 30 million new clients.

dellinger63 06-24-2011 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 786848)
LOL - hardly.

The health care law repeal attempt was voted upon earlier this year, and already failed.

The recalls in Wisconsin may fail, too. Or may pass.

Both are moving along their legal, constitutional channels as the voters want.

Nothing hypocritical about that at all, is there?

Yes, I'll be sending more money to Wisconsin Democrats, to help their repeal efforts. Glad to do it :tro:

Glad your sending money to wi instead of paying for your own bum knee.

Obamacare is unconstititional and that's the difference.

Riot 06-25-2011 05:28 PM

Wisconsin Justice Prosser assaults another judge
 
The above title should read "allegedly", I guess.

Yeah, good thing this complete loser guy was elected to the Supreme Court in Wisconsin. Maybe he has dementia. First he announces to the world his purpose on the court will be to support the governor's agenda, now he's under investigation for assaulting another judge.

Old, angry white guys. It's sad. McCain, Prosser ...

Big long article with much detail here:

Quote:

Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice David Prosser allegedly grabbed fellow Justice Ann Walsh Bradley around the neck in an argument in her chambers last week, according to at least three knowledgeable sources.

They say an argument that occurred before the court’s release of a decision upholding a bill to curtail the collective bargaining rights of public employees culminated in a physical altercation in the presence of other justices. Bradley purportedly asked Prosser to leave her office, whereupon Prosser grabbed Bradley by the neck with both hands.

In March, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported that, in a disagreement over a case last year, Justice Prosser had called Justice Abrahamson a “total bitch” and threatened to “destroy” her. Prosser, the paper reported, confirmed making the remarks, saying he “probably overreacted” while accusing Justices Abrahamson and Bradley of being “masters at deliberately goading people into perhaps incautious statements.”

Read more: http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/loc...#ixzz1QKDzZXwm

Riot 06-25-2011 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 786869)
Glad your sending money to wi instead of paying for your own bum knee.

Sorry, Mr. Ignorant, I do both ;)

dellinger63 06-25-2011 08:53 PM

Hats off again to Walker

Quote:

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Gov. Scott Walker will veto a part of the state budget that would have changed the way chewing tobacco products are taxed in the state.


Walker spokesman Cullen Werwie tells The Associated Press on Friday that Walker opposes the change put into the budget by the Legislature because it could lower the price of some tobacco products and make them more attractive to children.


Werwie released details of the veto to the AP in advance of Walker signing the budget and announcing other vetoes on Sunday.


The American Cancer Society and other groups lobbied Walker to veto the tax change, which would have taxed smokeless tobacco products based on their weight rather than a percentage of their price. The current price-based system ensures all such products are taxed equally.

Riot 06-25-2011 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 787132)
Riot maybe you can lobby the KY legislature to do the same. It might keep your mind off pubic workers' unions in distant states.

You contention that people that don't live in a state can't care what happens there is ridiculous and silly.

I've very happy New York legalized gay marriage. The GOP Governors union-busting agenda is being implemented in multiple states, and I'm quite happy to help people in those states fight the removal of individual freedom.

Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice David Prosser needs to resign immediately. Assaulting a judge is a felony in Wisconsin. He has committed physical assault on a coworker. He has a history of verbal abuse in the workplace. He could be brought up under Title VII.

Do you agree or not?

dellinger63 06-25-2011 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 787133)
You contention that people that don't live in a state can't care what happens there is ridiculous and silly.

I've very happy New York legalized gay marriage. The GOP Governors union-busting agenda is being implemented in multiple states, and I'm quite happy to help people in those states fight the removal of individual freedom.

Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice David Prosser needs to resign immediately. Assaulting a judge is a felony in Wisconsin. He has committed physical assault on a coworker. He has a history of verbal abuse in the workplace. He could be brought up under Title VII.

Do you agree or not?

I'm happy for the New York law and think it should be the law of the land.

Prosser didn't assault anyone. And oooooo verbal abuse and title 7? :eek:

You have a current, US President who has our troops, fighting a illegal war, under the command of a foreign entity, yet he claims there is no war, despite there being tape and you're concerned with a story of a Supreme Court Justice from a State not your own, who assaulted an underling?

Blinks On!

Riot 06-25-2011 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 787136)
I'm happy for the New York law and think it should be the law of the land.

To quote another poster, you'd do better to stop interfering in New York, and pay more attention to Wisconsin :p

Quote:

Prosser didn't assault anyone.
Quote:

a Supreme Court Justice from a State not your own, who assaulted an underling?
Blinks on? ROFLMAO. You are commenting, but obviously didn't even bother to read the story - which is it, Dell? "Didn't assault anyone" or "assaulted an underling"

Factually, it's neither of your imagined scenarios: Prosser physically assaulted another Justice on the Supreme court

He absolutely needs to resign by end of business Monday.

dellinger63 06-25-2011 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 787139)
To quote another poster, you'd do better to stop interfering in New York, and pay more attention to Wisconsin :p





Blinks on? ROFLMAO. You are commenting, but obviously didn't even bother to read the story - which is it, Dell? "Didn't assault anyone" or "assaulted an underling"

Factually, it's neither of your imagined scenarios: Prosser physically assaulted another Justice on the Supreme court

He absolutely needs to resign by end of business Monday.

It allegedly happened in her chambers? Is she the only judge w/o a bailiff? He assaulted no one or she failed to report a crime. Considering their previous relationship I'll take the former.

BTW By your reponse I take it you DO think the alleged assault is more important than Lybia. :zz: Blinks On for sure!

Riot 06-25-2011 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 787142)
It allegedly happened in her chambers? Is she the only judge w/o a bailiff? He assaulted no one or she failed to report a crime. Considering their previous relationship I'll take the former.

You still apparently haven't read any articles about what's happening with this, have you? :D

Quote:

BTW By your reponse I take it you DO think the alleged assault is more important than Lybia.
And take my lack of reponse (sic) about unicorns to indicate I think Prosser was riding one when he attacked his fellow judge ;)

Over/under on Prosser resignation: Weiner took three weeks, I'll bet Prosser is gone in two.

dellinger63 06-25-2011 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 787147)
You still apparently haven't read any articles about what's happening with this, have you? :D



And take my lack of reponse (sic) about unicorns to indicate I think Prosser was riding one when he attacked his fellow judge ;)

Over/under on Prosser resignation: Weiner took three weeks, I'll bet Prosser is gone in two.

Yea such big news it didn't even make the Gazette. He's going nowhere.

Riot 06-26-2011 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 787157)
Yea such big news it didn't even make the Gazette. He's going nowhere.

Naw. Just NYTimes, Forbes, Associated Press, etc. National media attention forcing both candidates to make more detailed statements today more directly addressing the situation (Prosser of course blames his victim, the victim sez no, her neck did not attack him as he alleges). The police chief is addressing charges on Monday, too.

Quote:

Yesterday's blockbuster headline that rightwing WI Supreme Court justice David Prosser may have committed battery against fellow justice Ann Walsh Bradley continues to make news, as both Prosser and Bradley have now released on the record statements giving their differing accounts of the incident.

Initially, both justices were circumspect in their reaction. When first contacted, Prosser reportedly said: "I have nothing to say about it" and Bradley also said "I have nothing to say."

Later in the day yesterday, however, as the media storm in Wisconsin gathered force, Prosser issued a statement:

"Once there's a proper review of the matter and the facts surrounding it are made clear, the anonymous claim made to the media will be proven false. Until then I will refrain from further public comment."

Sources close to him then approached the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel anonymously, which reported his version like this:

According to [these sources], Bradley charged Prosser, who raised his hands to defend himself and made contact with her neck.

Those comments led to a full on the record statement by Bradley, as quoted in the Journal-Sentinel:

"The facts are that I was demanding that he get out of my office and he put his hands around my neck in anger in a chokehold. Those are the facts and you can try to spin those facts and try to make it sound like I ran up to him and threw my neck into his hands, but that's only spin."

Matters of abusive behavior in the workplace aren't resolved by competing press releases.

I'm confident the appropriate authorities will conduct a thorough investigation of this incident involving abusive behavior in the workplace.

While Bradley did an excellent job of calling out Prosser's "blame the victim" tactic, it's unfortunate she's choosing to describe the incident as abusive behavior in the workplace, rather than the felonious battery on a justice that Prosser appears to have committed.

Over the next day or two it will be interesting to see if the Wisconsin Judicial Commission confirms that an investigation is underway. Its initial statement on the matter was to neither confirm nor deny, but now that both parties involved are on the record that something happened the Commission may in fact have to acknowledge that it has received a formal complaint. Its rules state:

"Should a complaint or investigation become known to the public, the Commission may issue a brief statement to confirm its pendency, clarify the procedural aspects of the proceedings, state that the judge denies the allegations, [etc.]"

Antitrust32 06-27-2011 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 787092)
Old, angry white guys. It's sad. :

racist and bigot

nebrady 06-27-2011 12:54 PM

Bunch of she said. If it was so bad why didn't she press charges along time ago? Oh by the way riot its official the budget has been signed! Time to party this week. Any of those protesters show up at your place yet? Told them you were a friend of walkers! Lol

Riot 06-27-2011 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nebrady (Post 787373)
Bunch of she said. If it was so bad why didn't she press charges along time ago?

Do some of you guys just not bother to read newspapers and learn about stuff that happens in your state before you talk about it?

Looks like she did indeed do something at the time: a Wisconsin Judicial Commission investigation is ongoing from then; and today the Dane Country Sheriff announced a second investigation.

Quote:

Oh by the way riot its official the budget has been signed! Time to party this week. Any of those protesters show up at your place yet? Told them you were a friend of walkers! Lol
Enjoy your tax hikes, and increased state deficit with that budget.

"Lol"

Riot 06-27-2011 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32 (Post 787365)
racist and bigot

LOL - I think you need to look up the definitions of the words you use before you try to use them in desperation where it really doesn't apply.

I am talking about two specific people: David Prosser, who is old, has a documented history of public anger, and is white; and John McCain, who is old, has a documented history of public anger, and is white.

Two old angry white guys.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.