Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Couldn't happen to a nicer guy... (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=42524)

GBBob 06-06-2011 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by geeker2 (Post 782127)
It would be funny if your room was next to his :p

Even better is that I have a meeting tomorrow at the hotel where the French dude dropped trow...It's a NY Sex tour redboard hotel thread

dellinger63 06-06-2011 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 782163)
He was just a loser jackass.

Was a loser jackass or is a loser jackass?

And should a loser jackass, who lied to his constituents repeatedly, resign or continue in office? :)

And will his wife be OK? ;)

Riot 06-06-2011 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 782190)
Was a loser jackass or is a loser jackass?

And should a loser jackass, who lied to his constituents repeatedly, resign or continue in office? :)

And will his wife be OK? ;)

According to you, lying is just fine.

According to me, it is not.

Riot 06-06-2011 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GBBob (Post 782187)
Even better is that I have a meeting tomorrow at the hotel where the French dude dropped trow...It's a NY Sex tour redboard hotel thread

Don't do anything to make the maids nervous ;)

dellinger63 06-06-2011 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 782193)
According to you, lying is just fine.

According to me, it is not.

Not sure, not knowing details with your wife's financial affairs is lying? But in Weiner's case it's on tape. So should HE resign?

hi_im_god 06-06-2011 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 782200)
Not sure, not knowing details with your wife's financial affairs is lying? But in Weiner's case it's on tape. So should HE resign?

yes.

dems want it more than you do.

dellinger63 06-06-2011 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hi_im_god (Post 782202)
yes.

dems want it more than you do.

we had a guy resign because he sent a pic not wearing a shirt, didn't even lie about it. Personally I'd love to see the lil Weiner stay.

geeker2 06-06-2011 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GBBob (Post 782187)
Even better is that I have a meeting tomorrow at the hotel where the French dude dropped trow...It's a NY Sex tour redboard hotel thread

Bob you're a regular Caligula !

joeydb 06-06-2011 09:39 PM

He's not resigning, and he's not making amends with anyone, so what, exactly, does "taking responsibility" mean?

GBBob 06-06-2011 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeydb (Post 782206)
He's not resigning, and he's not making amends with anyone, so what, exactly, does "taking responsibility" mean?

Umm..he's admitting it's his dick?...:zz:

:rolleyes:

Riot 06-06-2011 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 782200)
Not sure, not knowing details with your wife's financial affairs is lying? But in Weiner's case it's on tape. So should HE resign?

Yes, it is lying when there's a spot on the government financial disclosure form where you are required by law to list if your wife has income, and disclose it and the source.

And when you list "none" - five years in a row - when you and everyone else in Washington know damns well your wife works for a lobbyist, that's a bad thing.

Especially when you are a Supreme Court Justice. Ignorance of the law is no excuse for violating it, right ;)

Weiner, unlike Clarence Thomas, didn't break any laws. No, no reason for him to resign. He can certainly get an ethics investigation within the House, and be subject to the decision there.

Riot 06-06-2011 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 782204)
we had a guy resign because he sent a pic not wearing a shirt, didn't even lie about it. Personally I'd love to see the lil Weiner stay.

But that guy resigned for no apparent reason - the assumption was that he resigned as there must be much more coming out that he wanted to hide.

Because sending a picture of yourself with your shirt off isn't an illegal thing ;)

slotdirt 06-07-2011 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 782163)
Breitbart (I keep spelling his name various ways, sorry) did try to get ahold Mike Stark, who deleted his Twitter account immediately after all this broke (he forward the stuff to Breitbart), made claims he possessed other stuff, e-mailed he didn't want to get involved, was one of the ones who were stalking Weiner, etc. Alot of weirdness going on there. You can read them on Kos. Yes, their stuff was hacked into and published.

Weiner probably should have apologized to Breitbart, but Breitbart just got lucky with his minions sending him something real. He's still known for being career-destroying by manufacturing lies.

Weiner on day one should have said, "Yeah, it's me, I goofed up, I'm now going home as I owe my wife everything if she'll still have me" and been done with it. He didn't break the law. He was just a loser jackass.

Ok, just to confirm that you understand though, there were no "hackers" involved. Weiner meant to send a message privately, accidentally posted it publicly, and then lied about it for 10 days to anybody who would ask. Stupidity did him in, not some sort of internet fairy.

geeker2 06-07-2011 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slotdirt (Post 782271)
Ok, just to confirm that you understand though, there were no "hackers" involved. Weiner meant to send a message privately, accidentally posted it publicly, and then lied about it for 10 days to anybody who would ask. Stupidity did him in, not some sort of internet fairy.


I bet it wasn't even Weiner's erection. I bet it was Breitbart :rolleyes:

All I know is if you pulled this stunt at most Corporations - you would be gone and gone quickly.

Rileyoriley 06-07-2011 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slotdirt (Post 782271)
Ok, just to confirm that you understand though, there were no "hackers" involved. Weiner meant to send a message privately, accidentally posted it publicly, and then lied about it for 10 days to anybody who would ask. Stupidity did him in, not some sort of internet fairy.

Somehow this must be Bush's fault.:rolleyes:

geeker2 06-07-2011 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rileyoriley (Post 782292)
Somehow this must be Bush's fault.:rolleyes:

It was his erection :p

somerfrost 06-07-2011 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by geeker2 (Post 782293)
It was his erection :p

A Texas longhorn? Seriously though, gave this guy the benefit of the doubt, especially considering the source...now it's time for him to go! Feel sorry for his wife and the folks who voted for this loser.

Riot 06-07-2011 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slotdirt (Post 782271)
Ok, just to confirm that you understand though, there were no "hackers" involved. Weiner meant to send a message privately, accidentally posted it publicly, and then lied about it for 10 days to anybody who would ask. Stupidity did him in, not some sort of internet fairy.

Yes, as I said, I'm aware of that. I'm saying that Breitbart and Stark (and other friends of Stark) were hacked into subsequent to their screen grabs, during the past week, by AnonyMiss.

Coach Pants 06-07-2011 03:31 PM

The FBI ans CIA have several informants in Anonymous.

Riot 06-07-2011 03:52 PM

I'd believe that about FBI-CIA. I'd believe nothing is private, and nothing is completely secure anymore.

AnonyMiss (women on the internet) and Anonymous are two different internet hacker groups, but work together, apparently.


Coach Pants 06-07-2011 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 782354)
I'd believe that about FBI-CIA. I'd believe nothing is private, and nothing is completely secure anymore.

AnonyMiss (women on the internet) and Anonymous are two different internet hacker groups, but work together, apparently.


Yeah they're doing it for the LULZ. It's the same group of nerds just branching out and trolling per usual.

The Iran hack jobs have CIA intervention written all over it. Like the nerds say..."It's a trap!"

dellinger63 06-07-2011 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 782354)
I'd believe that about FBI-CIA. I'd believe nothing is private, and nothing is completely secure anymore.

AnonyMiss (women on the internet) and Anonymous are two different internet hacker groups, but work together, apparently.


Started as a muslim group keeping track of their women. CIA can go straight in using keystroke via Echelon.

OldDog 06-08-2011 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 782204)
Personally I'd love to see the lil Weiner stay.

Same here, now that he's been effectively castrated.

In the meantime I just can't get this song out of my head . . .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1-RFrL0TzM

geeker2 06-08-2011 06:42 PM

The Weiner worked!


http://foxnewsinsider.com/2011/06/08...e-is-pregnant/

joeydb 06-08-2011 08:47 PM

He has a completely graphic picture out there today, according to the news. It just keeps getting worse for this guy.

Breitbart didn't release it, but apparently Opie and Anthony did.

SCUDSBROTHER 06-08-2011 09:22 PM

Not only did he publicly lie (repeatedly) about doing it, he created a 3rd party to blame it on. Got to go.....Yesterday.

Coach Pants 06-08-2011 09:27 PM

Mainstream media is obsessed with this story. It's like nothing else in the world matters.

Comfortably dumb.

hi_im_god 06-08-2011 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants (Post 782807)
Mainstream media is obsessed with this story. It's like nothing else in the world matters.

Comfortably dumb.

68 posts and counting here. it's not like any media company's shareholders are clamoring for the ceo's resignation because they don't limit coverage to important topics. i gave up after o.j.

don't blame the messenger. it's the mainstream. not the media.

Coach Pants 06-08-2011 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hi_im_god (Post 782808)
68 posts and counting here. it's not like any media company's shareholders are clamoring for the ceo's resignation because they don't limit coverage to important topics. i gave up after o.j.

don't blame the messenger. it's the mainstream. not the media.

Well yeah.

Riot 06-08-2011 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeydb (Post 782794)
He has a completely graphic picture out there today, according to the news. It just keeps getting worse for this guy.

Breitbart didn't release it, but apparently Opie and Anthony did.

Go look on the internet, it's no big deal.

The more attention and screaming this gets, the less I want the guy to resign, and just leave it up to his district to re-elect him or not. The lying is what is bothersome to me, he should have just come out and said, "Yeah, it's me". Then this would have been gone a week ago. So let his constituents decide if they want him in Congress representing them.

We have plenty of sex-scandal guys who actually broke laws who didn't resign, Weiner didn't even get any nor break any laws - why should he?

hi_im_god 06-08-2011 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 782829)
Go look on the internet, it's no big deal.

The more attention and screaming this gets, the less I want the guy to resign, and just leave it up to his district to re-elect him or not. The lying is what is bothersome to me, he should have just come out and said, "Yeah, it's me". Then this would have been gone a week ago. So let his constituents decide if they want him in Congress representing them.

We have plenty of sex-scandal guys who actually broke laws who didn't resign, Weiner didn't even get any nor break any laws - why should he?

because he's a distraction from more important issues. and he's a convenient brush the other side will use to paint everyone on your side with in broad strokes.

the game was over at that ridiculous press conference. i don't want to defend him. i want him to resign. this whole thing plays out worse every day he's in office.

the sooner he leaves the headlines the better.

Riot 06-09-2011 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hi_im_god (Post 782839)
because he's a distraction from more important issues. ... the sooner he leaves the headlines the better.

I don't think that's him, that's our sad culture and media. Yeah, OJ was probably when media jumped the shark.

hi_im_god 06-09-2011 12:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 782843)
I don't think that's him, that's our sad culture and media. Yeah, OJ was probably when media jumped the shark.

he's a reduced scale richard nixon on august 8th 1974. pretty much the entire world understands what happens next but he's still discussing things with pat.

Danzig 06-09-2011 08:23 AM

it's funny tho-rangel for instance has real ethics issues, and there he remains. but weiner has some questionable photos texted, off with his head-so to speak.

yeah, people have their priorities in order.

Danzig 06-09-2011 12:11 PM

http://www.slate.com/id/2296605/

Weiner Police
The sudden sexual piety of Democrats who say Anthony Weiner must resign.
By William Saletan


After all the self-serving, morally selective posturing we've heard from Rep. Anthony Weiner over the past two weeks, it's such a relief to see him finally being thrown overboard by his self-serving, morally selective colleagues.


and at the end:

Why have Kaine, Rendell, Schwartz, and other Democrats suddenly become righteous about sex and lying? Because Weiner has become a political liability, and he's expendable. In 1998, when Clinton lied, the polls were on his side. Rendell put it bluntly at the time: "The most recent poll shows that two-thirds of the country want this to go away, even if they did have a sexual relationship and even if he did lie." Schwartz made the same point a year later, noting that most Americans believed it was "time to move on" from Clinton's offenses. And the year after that, when Kaine campaigned for Robb, he needed the senator's help in Kaine's future campaign for governor.

Now these politicians want Weiner to get out of the way so they can get back to bashing Republicans over Medicare. Fine. But spare us the moralizing.

dellinger63 06-09-2011 12:31 PM

My lord if bubba's history with Monica, Paula et al was a private matter, despite him lying under oath, surely, showing the little weiner and lying to Wolf Blitzer/CNN is nothing.

What happened to 'what goes on in one's bedroom, etc'? His wife's pregnant and he's texting 'lil richard' to strangers. What's wrong with that? He should stay! ;)

joeydb 06-09-2011 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 782937)
My lord if bubba's history with Monica, Paula et al was a private matter, despite him lying under oath, surely, showing the little weiner and lying to Wolf Blitzer/CNN is nothing.

What happened to 'what goes on in one's bedroom, etc'? His wife's pregnant and he's texting 'lil richard' to strangers. What's wrong with that? He should stay! ;)


With the internet, there are potentially 6 billion witnesses in your bedroom. :eek:

Rileyoriley 06-09-2011 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 782864)
it's funny tho-rangel for instance has real ethics issues, and there he remains. but weiner has some questionable photos texted, off with his head-so to speak.

yeah, people have their priorities in order.

And yet these are the people we're supposed to rely on to manage health care, ss, medicare, etc..:rolleyes:

No thanks. I'll rely on myself.:)

clyde 06-09-2011 08:44 PM

I would like to rely on myself as well....may I send you a photo of my fine pud?

Rileyoriley 06-09-2011 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clyde (Post 783127)
I would like to rely on myself as well....may I send you a photo of my fine pud?

No thank you Mr. Weiner.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.