![]() |
First Big East team goes down. Who is next Cincy? Uconn?
|
What a debacle. St. John's got hosed in both seeding and location, and it shows. Should have been them beating up on Missouri instead of the Bearcats last night.
|
Steve Lavin sucks.
|
Why? He took a team that had lost more Big East games over the previous seven seasons than any other in history and made the tournament. Not his fault the selection committee had it out for the Big East (see the freaking SECOND round matchup between UConn and Cincinnati on Saturday).
|
You're a St. John's fan? If so, you're satisfied with any modicum of success. Thus your opinion is biased.
In time you'll see that he sucks. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I love hearing that the Big East shouldn't have 11 teams, yet I've not heard a single person point out a resume from a non-Big East school that would necessitate only having, say, ten in the tournament. Just compare the 11 Big East resumes to the teams who didn't make the field.
I'm complaining about seeding because St. John's got absolutely hosed in both seeding and location. A., of the six seeds, they had the best profile and should have traveled the shortest distance. B., they were made to play against easily the top 11 seed in the entire bracket. I'd trade the place and team STJ had to play with any of the other six seeds 100 times out of 100. And there are 11 Big East teams in the tournament, meaning conference foes shouldn't have to play each other before the round of 16. Only by intent was it set up that four Big East teams will eliminate each other before the second week of the tournament. If you think the selection committee didn't do that on purpose, then I don't know what to tell you. So easy to say "the Big East is overrated" without even remotely substantiating the claim. Louisville lost yesterday because Morehead State systemically took out Louisville's two best players. St. John's mostly sucked, so no excuses there, but if that Morehead game was called fair, Morehead doesn't have a shot. A guy on Morehead literally bodyslammed Louisville's Siva, injuring him, and didn't get called. Awful officiating. |
That was a bodyslam? Sure it was a foul but come on. It just looked brutal cause that dude is a giant.
|
Should have least been two shots and the ball, IMO. Regardless, beating a crippled Louisville team doesn't necessarily reflect on an entire conference.
|
Quote:
|
Pretty amazing that Louisville did as well as they did considering two of their three best returning players played less than 1/3 of the entire season because of injuries. Louisville should be pretty darn good next year.
The OVC is always tough. Fear Popeye Jones! |
Quote:
the right non call was made. all ball. the only reason the kid fell is his momemtum was taking him that way and the blocked shot was powerful. a foul call would have been horrible. |
Quote:
It was the play when Siva went to the basket and tried to challenge Faried. |
Yeah, no complaint about the play at the end of the game. It was borderline, but can't be called in that situation. Any other time of the game and that is typically called, though folks don't challenge three's quite so vociferously in the first half.
|
Quote:
there were a few missed calls yesterday. Jimmer got crushed a few times with no calls (then again, he has the ball on every play). I think there was a big no call in the Penn State game towards the end. But overall, great basketball. And besides WVU (my brothers school), Fucl< the Big East! They are always so overrated. I had Richmond and Gonzaga in my bracket, missed Morehead, UCLA, Cinci & Kansas St. |
Quote:
|
I wonder if I'll be able to slip out of work an hour early today to watch the entire U of A game.. my bosses are out today.. hmm
|
Agreed. Though I have to disagree on Jimmer ever getting crushed. From watching that Wofford game last night, I'm pretty sure breathing on Jimmer might have been a foul in a few situations. Nobody gets more calls than that guy. Gonzaga is going to crush BYU.
|
Quote:
|
Really, you thought he was awesome from watching that game? He's a gunner. The guy can obviously play, but I think the hype machine is in overdrive with him. I wouldn't mind seeing the Pepsi Center spontaneously combust on Saturday as you'll have two of the most annoying entities in college basketball in the Duke of the West (Gonzaga) and Jimmer himself on the court at the same time.
|
Quote:
he rushed a few, but even when he rushes shots they go in half the time. Also it seems like he's the only player on the court. He alone makes BYU a good basketball team. I was impressed by his passing too, I wonder what his role will be in the NBA. |
Jimmer seems like the Tim Tebow of college basketball ;)
|
Quote:
You don't seriously think he will have a significant role in the NBA do you? He is a really nice college player, but in the pros, he will be too slow to guard a point and too small to guard a wing. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
His role in the NBA will be to go play in Turkey or something. 93 percent of the crap he gets away with at BYU won't work in the league.
|
A nice college player....might stick around in the NBA with the right team, we've seen a lot of this type player in the last few years, coming of the bench to hopefully add a little offense would be his best case future it would seem. Might average 6-8 pts a game with right squad.
|
"We"
The Wiccans? GTFO douche |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Blair is an excellent low post scorer and rebounder. Reddick is has great range and is a solid defender. The idea that they are only in the NBA because of "hustle and desire" is complete bullshit. TH is averaging 10 and 5 but isnt really good enough to play more than he does. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The three players you listed all have a unique NBA skill that keeps them in the league. If you have 1 elite skill and are willing to work for less than top dollar you can play for along time. Reddick has great range and is athletic enough to defend 2's fairly well. Blair is a lot more athletic than he looks and is a very good rebounder and has a light touch. I don't really know that Hansborough has an elite skill other than a high motor. But all three of these guys are limited players who won't ever get more than 25 minutes a game on a good team. They arent simply in the NBA because they work hard. They have NBA skills. Jimmer can score. He cant do much else but he will play as long as he stays quick on his feet and can shoot. He will never be more than a role player because he just isnt good enough but his peak may be Vinny Johnson which means something. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think he compares to a whole slew of guys over the years like hopson, respert, alford, hoiberg (great nickname), rodney monroe...the list goes on forever. Not the same position but how much of a bust was adam morrison? Again, two slow to beat 3's and too weak to play 4. If you aren't "nba sized", you better be really athletic to be able to get a shot off in the big leagues. Jimmer is kind of like a tweener guard. I don't care if he can shoot to 40 feet, if he can't get the shot off and can't cover, he isn't going to play. |
Quote:
No one is making the argument that JF is going to be a really good player but unlike those guys listed he can score and if Eddie House can play 10 years in the NBA, JF can make it too. Hell Steve Nash is an abysmal defensive player and he is a shoo in hall of famer. |
http://www.draftexpress.com/nba-mock-draft/2011/
Draftexpress latest mock draft has Jimmer going #17 to....... The Knicks!! His defense fits in perfectly! |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.