Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   No Preakness in 2011?? (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=39787)

Indian Charlie 12-01-2010 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS (Post 729159)
De Gaul? Clemenceau? usurped?

In a match-up with Kasept - I'd take Tector and the points.

Tector is the worlds sharpest mouthed Italian.

And a lawyer.

I think Tector would be giving points, not getting them.

Indian Charlie 12-01-2010 12:16 AM

Actually, that would be an interesting thread in Eso. Head to head DT matchups in debate skills.

I use the term 'debate' loosely.

For instance, DrugS -130 vs Joey Salvator +110

Sterling -110 vs TFF -110

CSC's opinion on one day -110 vs his opinion the next day -110

Coach Pants -200 vs Doreen +170

Etc.

iamthelurker 12-01-2010 02:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie (Post 729178)
Actually, that would be an interesting thread in Eso. Head to head DT matchups in debate skills.

I use the term 'debate' loosely.

For instance, DrugS -130 vs Joey Salvator +110

Sterling -110 vs TFF -110

CSC's opinion on one day -110 vs his opinion the next day -110

Coach Pants -200 vs Doreen +170

Etc.

Can we change debate to steel cage match?

Indian Charlie 12-01-2010 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iamthelurker (Post 729190)
Can we change debate to steel cage match?

No.

Debate here would be far more gruesome.

NTamm1215 12-01-2010 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie (Post 729178)
Actually, that would be an interesting thread in Eso. Head to head DT matchups in debate skills.

I use the term 'debate' loosely.

For instance, DrugS -130 vs Joey Salvator +110

Sterling -110 vs TFF -110

CSC's opinion on one day -110 vs his opinion the next day -110

Coach Pants -200 vs Doreen +170

Etc.

The money poured in on DrugS so feverishly that they took it off the board.

The Indomitable DrugS 12-01-2010 09:29 AM

I'm easily shady enough to load up on the price with Rock Hard Ten '85 - and throw the match.

notyep59 12-01-2010 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS (Post 729220)
I'm easily shady enough to load up on the price with Rock Hard Ten '85 - and throw the match.

we could call it something like the "black sox scandal"?? the only problem is Drugs + sox + scandal??? people will automatically think it has some sexual meaning about a gunked-up sock.

Indian Charlie 12-01-2010 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS (Post 729220)
I'm easily shady enough to load up on the price with Rock Hard Ten '85 - and throw the match.

That's why I kept the numbers low like that.

It's a morning line.

Dahoss 12-01-2010 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie (Post 729229)
That's why I kept the numbers low like that.

It's a morning line.

Your morning lines are very Battaglia-esque.

Indian Charlie 12-01-2010 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dahoss (Post 729322)
Your morning lines are very Battaglia-esque.

Well, I kept the Salvatore one low because I suspected DrugS would pull a Satan vs. Jesus move, like in South Park.

I put BTW vs TFF at pickem because while I know Serling would win that debate, TFF would refuse to see reason and continue to argue his worthless point until BTW's head exploded.

Coach Pants, I admit, was a huge underlay vs Doreen.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.