Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Secretariat: The Movie, Whoa! (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=38668)

Danzig 10-09-2010 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaTH716 (Post 705014)
If you really think about it, they probably should hope that some die hard racing fans stay away from it, because they are going to be the most critical about it. You would think that many of the people are going to complain about footage being filmed at other tracks than the original and elements of the story that are exaggerated or wrong. If anything there is a chance that they will talk people out of going to see the film.
If this film is going to do any damage at the box office, they are going to need mainstream America's support. But even if they kill it this weekend, what possible racing movie would they really consider doing?

one on zenyatta!

Danzig 10-09-2010 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phalaris1913 (Post 705109)
I have read a review that suggested there was an "underdog" element to the movie. Is this true? If so, what did they have to do to contrive "underdog"-ness either for Secretariat himself or his connections?

from what i've read, it involves penny chenery and her moving in a mostly male world of horse racing. i guess some of the men are portrayed in a less than flattering light.

Merlinsky 10-09-2010 10:22 AM

Secretariat had a $35 mil budget, Sebiscuit was $87 mil. Can you tell in terms of production values?

Box office is going be a bit funky this weekend. There's a Katherine Heigl movie out and she always has a shot at number one. God only knows why people still go. Women drag their bf/husband so that doubles the ticket sales. She has ability and for some reason ends up with Jennifer Aniston reject movies which I refuse to watch.

The Social Network's got good word of mouth in week 2 and is a contender for a few Oscars, especially screenplay. It and the Heigl movie are neck and neck for the lead right now, but Secretariat's not too far back. After Saturday we'll have a better idea. Initially I was disappointed it wasn't opening as big as I thought it would, then I realized all 3 movies I just mentioned would finish behind Seabiscuit's opening weekend which was a tad earlier in 2003 I think. Seabiscuit came out in 5th place its week at just under $21 mil.

Princess Doreen 10-09-2010 06:59 PM

We saw Secretariat yesterday. For those in the audience (many of whom didn't know Secretariat actually won the Triple Crown), it was a good movie. I had to squint and keep from groaning at the myriad of inaccuracies - inaccuracies that could have been avoided.

That being said, Diane Lane was superb and John Malkovich made me believe he was Lucien Lauren.

It might get people interested in horse racing if horse racing was accessible on national tv. But, what's the odds of that happening?

Also, bought the SECRETARIAT memorial book that DRF put out. Worth $10 - lots of new info and good pictures.

TheSpyder 10-10-2010 06:10 AM

I'll wait for the play..should be good on Broadway

deltagulf 10-10-2010 08:02 AM

opening week-end its # 3 13 plus million so i guess its not to bad. we'll see

Mike 10-10-2010 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GBBob (Post 703338)
But..everything you are critical of the general population either a) Won't know or B) Will eat it up..Look...exposure is exposure and given the choice between a hokey Disney piece on Secretariat and an open piece on Horse Racing by Oliver Stone...I'll take hokey. There have been so many ridiculous 'baseball" movies..most involving Kevin Costner..over the years that as a baseball purist, make me vomit, but the GP loves that crap. Horse Racing needs more drivel and less reality sometimes.



Oliver Stone doing a movie would be more likely to appeal to the dark souls likely to get hooked on racing;)

Horse racing historians, any thoughts on a topic Stone could take on?

Indian Charlie 10-10-2010 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike (Post 705642)
Oliver Stone doing a movie would be more likely to appeal to the dark souls likely to get hooked on racing;)

Horse racing historians, any thoughts on a topic Stone could take on?

Synthetic surfaces being mandated in California.

Danzig 10-10-2010 10:57 AM

trainers and their ability to grow their business after a long suspension for drugs.

Riot 10-10-2010 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike (Post 705642)
Oliver Stone doing a movie would be more likely to appeal to the dark souls likely to get hooked on racing;)

Horse racing historians, any thoughts on a topic Stone could take on?

Shergar. But Stone would probably rather love Alydar and conspiracy.

Indian Charlie 10-10-2010 11:05 AM

How about a Stone expose on jockey licensing.

I'd love to have it revealed that jockeys must fail an IQ test to become licensed.

Scav 10-10-2010 11:14 AM

Roger Ebert's review, who has been a long time friend of Bill Nack, gives it 4 stars and says it is in the running for film of the year

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/...IEWS/101009986

RockHardTen1985 10-10-2010 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Merlinsky (Post 705329)
Secretariat had a $35 mil budget, Sebiscuit was $87 mil. Can you tell in terms of production values?

Box office is going be a bit funky this weekend. There's a Katherine Heigl movie out and she always has a shot at number one. God only knows why people still go. Women drag their bf/husband so that doubles the ticket sales. She has ability and for some reason ends up with Jennifer Aniston reject movies which I refuse to watch.

The Social Network's got good word of mouth in week 2 and is a contender for a few Oscars, especially screenplay. It and the Heigl movie are neck and neck for the lead right now, but Secretariat's not too far back. After Saturday we'll have a better idea. Initially I was disappointed it wasn't opening as big as I thought it would, then I realized all 3 movies I just mentioned would finish behind Seabiscuit's opening weekend which was a tad earlier in 2003 I think. Seabiscuit came out in 5th place its week at just under $21 mil.

I took a guy from work to see Let Me In last night, at a small older theater... It was packed. And I think that movie has been out for a while.

Indian Charlie 10-10-2010 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985 (Post 705693)
I took a guy from work to see Let Me In last night, at a small older theater... It was packed. And I think that movie has been out for a while.

Did he put out?

RockHardTen1985 10-10-2010 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie (Post 705694)
Did he put out?

No, but Im likely in trouble. I got a phone call this morning. He could not sleep and was having nightmares, talking about vampires.

Indian Charlie 10-10-2010 12:12 PM

You should cuddle.

Cannon Shell 10-10-2010 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 705318)
one on zenyatta!

Then Ebert and company could get death threats when they call the plot unimaginative and cowardly.

GenuineRisk 10-10-2010 02:45 PM

Saw it last night. Almost so bad it's good, but not quite. Thanks for the budget numbers, Merlinsky; that explains why it looked so bad. It was either shot on a combination of film and video or entirely on video and then transferred to film (poorly). Also explains why there were so many scenes of people sitting around talking about things instead of showing those things happening. I don't think there was a single scene of Malkovich's character actually training a horse.

And the dialogue is really clunky. They should give Diane Lane an honorary Oscar just for all the as God is my witness I'll never be hungry again speeches she had to deliver.

The best part was the two people sitting behind us.
Diane Lane: "Daddy, this is Big Red."
Lady Behind Us: "I THOUGHT HIS NAME WAS SECRETARIAT."

Merlinsky 10-10-2010 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GenuineRisk (Post 705760)
The best part was the two people sitting behind us.
Diane Lane: "Daddy, this is Big Red."
Lady Behind Us: "I THOUGHT HIS NAME WAS SECRETARIAT."

:p May God inspire a woman like that to bet on racehorses. Talk about dumb money.

Yeah I did a double take when I realized the budget was so different. Another point about the shooting of the movie, I heard the director said they tried to shoot the racing with better cameras, but it looked lousy so they did it with cheap $800 cameras and it supposedly looked better. No idea how bad it must've been to not go with the original footage.

The Seabiscuit book was such a phenomenon. People who didn't normally follow the sport got interested in the film because the book was big. There's another book about a horse being adapted for the screen. Steven Spielberg's doing a film based on the novel War Horse. http://www.filmofilia.com/2010/05/06...rgs-war-horse/

randallscott35 10-10-2010 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GenuineRisk (Post 705760)
Saw it last night. Almost so bad it's good, but not quite. Thanks for the budget numbers, Merlinsky; that explains why it looked so bad. It was either shot on a combination of film and video or entirely on video and then transferred to film (poorly). Also explains why there were so many scenes of people sitting around talking about things instead of showing those things happening. I don't think there was a single scene of Malkovich's character actually training a horse.

And the dialogue is really clunky. They should give Diane Lane an honorary Oscar just for all the as God is my witness I'll never be hungry again speeches she had to deliver.

The best part was the two people sitting behind us.
Diane Lane: "Daddy, this is Big Red."
Lady Behind Us: "I THOUGHT HIS NAME WAS SECRETARIAT."

Disney has cut costs for years. Even their G rated flicks look cheap these days.

Arletta 10-10-2010 07:25 PM

I think I have read enough to know I will wait for it to come out on DVD.

MaTH716 10-11-2010 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Merlinsky (Post 705916)
:p May God inspire a woman like that to bet on racehorses. Talk about dumb money.

Yeah I did a double take when I realized the budget was so different. Another point about the shooting of the movie, I heard the director said they tried to shoot the racing with better cameras, but it looked lousy so they did it with cheap $800 cameras and it supposedly looked better. No idea how bad it must've been to not go with the original footage.

The Seabiscuit book was such a phenomenon. People who didn't normally follow the sport got interested in the film because the book was big. There's another book about a horse being adapted for the screen. Steven Spielberg's doing a film based on the novel War Horse. http://www.filmofilia.com/2010/05/06...rgs-war-horse/

I also think that people embraced Seabiscuit and Red Pollard (for that matter) because of their underdog status/story. It was a REAL likeable story that was easy to root for. There was a true high created for the end of the movie (even though they ruined it by having him come from like 20 lengths out to win).
I really believe that people who don't follow the sport can't appreciate how good Secretariat was. And from what I'm hearing the rest of the storyline around the movie sounds ficitional. So it just sounds like a tough movie to really embrace. I guess they leave the theater thinking that Big Red saved the farm, which would really detract how good he was on the track. That's bad for the sport. I would almost rather have people watch the ESPN sports century on Secretariat. I thought that was a great piece that really hit the spot on how good he was and what he really meant to Penny Chennery. Obviously if you a fan of the sport, the Bill Nack book is a must.

I still plan on seeing it, but I am really not expecting much.

Bigsmc 10-11-2010 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaTH716 (Post 706005)
I also think that people embraced Seabiscuit and Red Pollard (for that matter) because of their underdog status/story. It was a REAL likeable story that was easy to root for. There was a true high created for the end of the movie (even though they ruined it by having him come from like 20 lengths out to win).
I really believe that people who don't follow the sport can't appreciate how good Secretariat was. And from what I'm hearing the rest of the storyline around the movie sounds ficitional. So it just sounds like a tough movie to really embrace. I guess they leave the theater thinking that Big Red saved the farm, which would really detract how good he was on the track. That's bad for the sport. I would almost rather have people watch the ESPN sports century on Secretariat. I thought that was a great piece that really hit the spot on how good he was and what he really meant to Penny Chennery. Obviously if you a fan of the sport, the Bill Nack book is a must.

I still plan on seeing it, but I am really not expecting much.

If that is the case, they must not tell the moviegoers that Meadow Farm/Stable won the 1972 Derby with Riva Ridge, or it would make it difficult to put the farm in dire straits so Secretariat could come along and save it.

MaTH716 10-11-2010 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bigsmc (Post 706007)
If that is the case, they must not tell the moviegoers that Meadow Farm/Stable won the 1972 Derby with Riva Ridge, or it would make it difficult to put the farm in dire straits so Secretariat could come along and save it.

From what I understand there is absolutely no mention of Riva Ridge in the entire movie.

Indian Charlie 10-11-2010 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaTH716 (Post 706009)
From what I understand there is absolutely no mention of Riva Ridge in the entire movie.

Since the producer, or writer, or whomever it was, said that Secretariat would have won the triple crown again had he not been retired as a 3yo, I doubt they even have heard of Riva Ridge.

Merlinsky 10-11-2010 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie (Post 706012)
Since the producer, or writer, or whomever it was, said that Secretariat would have won the triple crown again had he not been retired as a 3yo, I doubt they even have heard of Riva Ridge.

Allegedly that was a misquote. It was really something about being a successful 4yo in the big races for older horses. Of course, that could've just been arse covering, but I'll let them go with that story.

Indian Charlie 10-11-2010 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Merlinsky (Post 706090)
Allegedly that was a misquote. It was really something about being a successful 4yo in the big races for older horses. Of course, that could've just been arse covering, but I'll let them go with that story.

That 'misquote' is so far off from what they said was really said, it really cannot be possible for it to be a misquote.

Merlinsky 10-11-2010 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie (Post 706113)
That 'misquote' is so far off from what they said was really said, it really cannot be possible for it to be a misquote.

On the contrary, happens all the time with celebrities. Sometimes quotes get entirely made up. Maybe whoever did the interview wanted a better one, didn't know jack about racing, and punched it up to the point of implausibility.

Indian Charlie 10-11-2010 03:57 PM

uh huh.

sounds perfectly applicable to this 'celebrity'

ddthetide 10-11-2010 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaTH716 (Post 706009)
From what I understand there is absolutely no mention of Riva Ridge in the entire movie.

we just came from the movie. there is NO mention of RR at all. 1972 starts with Secretariat's first race in july at aqueduct. the movie is really about Ms. Chenery.

Merlinsky 10-11-2010 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ddthetide (Post 706301)
we just came from the movie. there is NO mention of RR at all. 1972 starts with Secretariat's first race in july at aqueduct. the movie is really about Ms. Chenery.

:( Sorry it was news to you that there was no Riva mention. It would be harder for me to walk in not knowing that, but we heard about it awhile back during the making of the movie (maybe Haskin or someone on ATR mentioned it) and I had a chance to get past my disappointment. There's not enough drama for a movie about a superhorse if Riva saves the day. The only real underdog they can create is 'housewife trying to save the farm.' It's what I was always afraid of when I thought someone should do a film about Secretariat. Getting over that hurdle is hard.

I haven't been able to go yet, planning to this week.

GenuineRisk 10-12-2010 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by randallscott35 (Post 705929)
Disney has cut costs for years. Even their G rated flicks look cheap these days.

Very true. Though I still don't understand why they couldn't have gotten a better screenplay. Writers are cheap. I feel like it's giving a big middle finger to the family-friendly crowd- hey, whatever with the coherent storyline and believable dialogue they'll watch anything as long as there's no swearin' and no nekkid people.

GenuineRisk 10-12-2010 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Merlinsky (Post 706306)
:( Sorry it was news to you that there was no Riva mention. It would be harder for me to walk in not knowing that, but we heard about it awhile back during the making of the movie (maybe Haskin or someone on ATR mentioned it) and I had a chance to get past my disappointment. There's not enough drama for a movie about a superhorse if Riva saves the day. The only real underdog they can create is 'housewife trying to save the farm.' It's what I was always afraid of when I thought someone should do a film about Secretariat. Getting over that hurdle is hard.

There's drama there, but it's in Riva Ridge's story. If Disney hadn't been so convinced it had to be a horse the general public (vaguely) had heard of, they could have had a nice little movie about love and sibling rivalries and parents loving their "kids" for who they are. You'd still have to fictionalize a lot, but Riva's story has more of an arc to it naturally. Maybe something like:

Act 1: Farm in trouble, Riva Ridge comes along, saves farm, public sees him as the best chance to break the Triple Crown curse. Penny falls in love with the ugly racehorse, rejoices in his celebrity. Horse adores her right back.
Act 2: Riva fails at TC, due to wet Preakness, has terrible second half of 3-year-old season. Along comes a real super horse, who, ironically, is also owned by Penny. Penny tries to like Secretariat, but can't, because he's outshining her favorite. Riva wins no awards, while Secretariat gets Horse of the Year.
Act 3: Riva pulls it together for 4-year-old season, Secretariat becomes even bigger star. On eve of Belmont states, Penny learns to celebrate what Secretariat is doing for racing, happy about TC, and can accept it wasn't to be for Riva. Public clamors for the 2 horses to meet. Penny desperately wants Riva to beat Big Red, but, before race, realizes Secretariat races for himself, but Riva races for her, and win or lose, if she loves him, that's all that matters to him (yeah, I know, but again, Disney movie). Riva loses to Secretariat in Marlboro Cup, Penny politely leaves winners' circle with Secretariat to go see Riva Ridge, saying to the press "I respect Secretariat but I love Riva Ridge." Which is the headline on some fictional sports article that comes out the next day.

Now, see, Disney? Is that so hard? And then some kid who saw the movie and later comes in third in the second-grade spelling bee comes home all depressed about not winning and her parent says, "But you did your best! You were just like Riva Ridge!" and the kid says, "But Riva came in second in the Marlboro and I came in third." And the parent says, "Don't you mouth off to me you little know-it-all" and then smacks the kid and Child Protection Services is called and that becomes a movie, too, but not for Disney; for Lifetime Telelvision.

Clip-Clop 10-12-2010 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GenuineRisk (Post 706451)
There's drama there, but it's in Riva Ridge's story. If Disney hadn't been so convinced it had to be a horse the general public (vaguely) had heard of, they could have had a nice little movie about love and sibling rivalries and parents loving their "kids" for who they are. You'd still have to fictionalize a lot, but Riva's story has more of an arc to it naturally. Maybe something like:

Act 1: Farm in trouble, Riva Ridge comes along, saves farm, public sees him as the best chance to break the Triple Crown curse. Penny falls in love with the ugly racehorse, rejoices in his celebrity. Horse adores her right back.
Act 2: Riva fails at TC, due to wet Preakness, has terrible second half of 3-year-old season. Along comes a real super horse, who, ironically, is also owned by Penny. Penny tries to like Secretariat, but can't, because he's outshining her favorite. Riva wins no awards, while Secretariat gets Horse of the Year.
Act 3: Riva pulls it together for 4-year-old season, Secretariat becomes even bigger star. On eve of Belmont states, Penny learns to celebrate what Secretariat is doing for racing, happy about TC, and can accept it wasn't to be for Riva. Public clamors for the 2 horses to meet. Penny desperately wants Riva to beat Big Red, but, before race, realizes Secretariat races for himself, but Riva races for her, and win or lose, if she loves him, that's all that matters to him (yeah, I know, but again, Disney movie). Riva loses to Secretariat in Marlboro Cup, Penny politely leaves winners' circle with Secretariat to go see Riva Ridge, saying to the press "I respect Secretariat but I love Riva Ridge." Which is the headline on some fictional sports article that comes out the next day.

Now, see, Disney? Is that so hard? And then some kid who saw the movie and later comes in third in the second-grade spelling bee comes home all depressed about not winning and her parent says, "But you did your best! You were just like Riva Ridge!" and the kid says, "But Riva came in second in the Marlboro and I came in third." And the parent says, "Don't you mouth off to me you little know-it-all" and then smacks the kid and Child Protection Services is called and that becomes a movie, too, but not for Disney; for Lifetime Telelvision.

I love it. Though this kind of thing no longer happens. Probably because schools are run to prevent any kind from coming in second let alone THIRD!

letswastemoney 10-12-2010 12:55 PM

The kid should be retired for losing the spelling bee. Only winners count these days.

GenuineRisk 10-12-2010 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by letswastemoney (Post 706468)
The kid should be retired for losing the spelling bee. Only winners count these days.

Clearly she'd done enough.

Ogygian 10-13-2010 01:17 PM

The title should have been "Penny", not Secretariat...
Seabiscuit and PharLap were much better...
I actually enjoyed Secretariat's "Sport's Century" much better then the movie...
I know it is difficult to replicate a race, but I'm not a fan of the horses bring strangled and the jockey's standing up as they are coming down the stretch...
I did like the fact they showed the actual Preakness call...I wish they could have showed the actual Derby and Belmont...and why did they just stop after the Belmont??? he did race more...they could have at least showed his final race...

hi_im_god 10-13-2010 02:41 PM

speaking of losers, how does sham fare in the movie? much of a role or just vague background for the triumphant winner?

Riot 10-13-2010 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hi_im_god (Post 706782)
speaking of losers, how does sham fare in the movie? much of a role or just vague background for the triumphant winner?

Alot of role, unfortunately, as they made those connections to be Secretariat's evil enemy.

I always had a soft spot for Sham - he broke the Derby record, too, and if Secretariat wasn't around, he would have been the best that year.

Merlinsky 10-13-2010 07:44 PM

I'd totally watch Riva Ridge: The Movie. How about we get one on Canonero II? Disney couldn't make it cuz they'd have to admit Riva existed when he gets beaten by Canonero II, but I think it could be done. Apparently he was born at Claiborne, which I'd forgotten, yet the underdog story begins immediately with his crooked leg. What's the connection to Greensboro, NC? Wikipedia had a screwy entry saying he was bred there, but technically he's KY bred. The plane ride drama of getting to the US alone was pretty crazy with his sharing a ride with chickens and ducks, the plane catching fire, not having proper papers, ending up in Panama, then Miami again, losing a lot of weight, getting dehydrated, and having to travel 1100 miles by van because they were running out of money. Then a language barrier keeps Churchill Downs from letting them in.

http://community.seattletimes.nwsour...6&slug=1285530

What it took to get that horse to the race is exciting, nevermind his winning the Derby and Preakness. There's Nixon, Vietnam, and the racing establishment apparently not too thrilled with this crooked legged Venezuelan colt. I'm not sure how you'd end it since he lost the Belmont, but there's gotta be a way for it not to be a downer. Maybe have it be about how he gets the Eclipse for Champion 3yo Colt.

I still think with Secretariat, the American public is the underdog in a way. Seabiscuit made folks happy during the Great Depression. Secretariat did it following the trauma of Vietnam and the radical changes the country'd just gone through. I like the Winston Churchill quote that sometimes the outside of a horse is good for the inside of a man.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.