Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Bailout bill fails (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=25332)

Danzig 09-29-2008 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GPK
In your opinion, does the federal government belong in the market place though?

i know you asked wiphan...but i would say imo, no. problem is, there aren't enough sound institutions left to buy the unsound. the feds feel that left alone, this problem will only snowball, costing us more in the long run then a taxpayer funded bailout would cost us now.

The Indomitable DrugS 09-29-2008 03:56 PM

Three things ought to happen.

* The Securites and Exchange Commision ought to be abolished.

* The Federal Reserve ought to be abolished.

* A massive amount of public lynchings need to go forward. A lot of these crooks in Washington and Wall Street simply ought to be hung - and it would be a lot of fun to watch.

Money doesn't belong on paper - it belongs in pockets. Enough with the government involvement that allows fictional money to exist only on paper.

However, the most important thing is that public lynchings return.

dalakhani 09-29-2008 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wiphan
The companies that made the bad loans have already been hurt and they are paying dearly for the fiscal irresponsibility that lead most of them into the situation. The problem is that there are no investors for very good, creditable consumers/businesses due to the issues and problems in the market place. Without the government stepping in and buying a lot of these investments, good honest businesses and consumers will not be able to obtain the financing that they normally could get. The government could actually profit by buying up these securities and some estimates are anywhere from $1-3 trillion yes trillion dollars in profit, by buying and holding these investments; however this depends on what price they buy them at. There is a liquidity crisis in the market that is affecting all financial institutions no matter if they ethically or unethically offered financing. The bailout is not all about letting bad businesses out of their fiscal irresponsible decisions.

And that is the 3 trillion dollar question: How in God's name are they going to price these assets?

CSC 09-29-2008 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wiphan
The companies that made the bad loans have already been hurt and they are paying dearly for the fiscal irresponsibility that lead most of them into the situation. The problem is that there are no investors for very good, creditable consumers/businesses due to the issues and problems in the market place. Without the government stepping in and buying a lot of these investments, good honest businesses and consumers will not be able to obtain the financing that they normally could get. The government could actually profit by buying up these securities and some estimates are anywhere from $1-3 trillion yes trillion dollars in profit, by buying and holding these investments; however this depends on what price they buy them at. There is a liquidity crisis in the market that is affecting all financial institutions no matter if they ethically or unethically offered financing. The bailout is not all about letting bad businesses out of their fiscal irresponsible decisions.

Fundamentally "toxic mortages" are toast and some feel why do taxpayers have to bail out a credit mess they had nothing to do with to begin with. These things should have been foreseen by the Fed long before it got to this point, I agree with alot of what you said but fundamentally I disagree with a Bailout.

dalakhani 09-29-2008 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants
And let me really offend some people now.

The Greatest Generation and their children are to blame. They let this s.hit happen because they feel entitled to do whatever they please. Future generations be damned.

This would actually be a great seperate topic. I lay the blame to the children of the greatest generation (yes, the boomers).

Why do you feel this way?

docicu3 09-29-2008 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wiphan
The companies that made the bad loans have already been hurt and they are paying dearly for the fiscal irresponsibility that lead most of them into the situation. The problem is that there are no investors for very good, creditable consumers/businesses due to the issues and problems in the market place. Without the government stepping in and buying a lot of these investments, good honest businesses and consumers will not be able to obtain the financing that they normally could get. The government could actually profit by buying up these securities and some estimates are anywhere from $1-3 trillion yes trillion dollars in profit, by buying and holding these investments; however this depends on what price they buy them at. There is a liquidity crisis in the market that is affecting all financial institutions no matter if they ethically or unethically offered financing. The bailout is not all about letting bad businesses out of their fiscal irresponsible decisions.

Okay I am going to put this out there hoping that it helps communicate the dire circumstances we are currently entering and what it means for the future for everybody.

I grew up the definition of middle class having a roof over my head, that my father rented literally week to week, never had to worry about whether I had clothes or food as my father did what he had to do to raise 3 sons and a daughter but there were no excesses of any kind.

I was fortunate enough to go to a state univ for a very afforable education, did decently academically and subsequently during the Regan years borrowed 250K, most of it with 18% HEAL money to finanace my medical education which I have subsequently paid back over 15 years.

With a credit rating in the mid to upper 600's I recently sold my home and applied for a mortgage offering 30% down payment on a home half the size of the place I sold. We had our application frozen or "denied at this time" due to the current circumstances. Now my job has changed substantially in the last 6 months and I have educational loans for my sons and about 10% of what I made last year in other debts but if I can't get an immediate loan at the best rates then what's going to happen to the people who are not as fortunate as I am when they want to but a home or finance a car while they have decent jobs and credit scores........this bill was not the answer but if you don't believe that we are about to enter one of the darkess financial times of our lifetime ask your friends who are trying to buy anything of substance how it is going for them.

Mortimer 09-29-2008 04:09 PM

Steven H. Crist.

SCUDSBROTHER 09-29-2008 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wiphan
The bailout is not all about letting bad businesses out of their fiscal irresponsible decisions.

Why are we giving these same crooks money to loan again? These CEO's with 50 and 100 million bucks made off bad loans(Paulson' s friends) need to be punished. I don't see a thing about doing that. The people crying loudest are doing it because their stocks are going down. Don't gamble on stocks anymore, or don't do it without being willing to take losses for gambling with your money. Your retirement in the stock market? Well, you fkd up. Don't look for innocent people to bail you out. You fkd up. You say you hate Socialism, but you are all putting your hand out for it. Meanwhile, your against the common person getting healthcare. YOU WANT SOCIALISM, BUT ONLY SOMETIME. FCK OFF.

docicu3 09-29-2008 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mortimer
Steven H. Crist.


Okay Morty I know I'll regret this but as I have said repeatedly you are the smartest guy who types here by far....what did Steven H. Crist mean?

The Indomitable DrugS 09-29-2008 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
These CEO's with 50 and 100 million bucks made off bad loans(Paulson' s friends) need to be punished.



ateamstupid 09-29-2008 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by docicu3
Okay Morty I know I'll regret this but as I have said repeatedly you are the smartest guy who types here by far....what did Steven H. Crist mean?

:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

SCUDSBROTHER 09-29-2008 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wiphan
The companies that made the bad loans have already been hurt and they are paying dearly for the fiscal irresponsibility that lead most of them into the situation.

Hurt so bad that Lehman bros. gave out 2.5 billion to employee's parachutes? Spare me this bullsh-it about how they were hurt. Damn crooks. They hurt others. They hurt guys like Doc that need a loan. They want the Gov't to put up the money to loan him. Money they would have if they had written safer loans, and not artificially driven up housing prices(to make more n' more interest.) I can't support giving people in this industry any adult level responsibilities. They are selfish greedy lying children. I don't trust them to do anything but repeat the same theft again. They artificially increased housing prices to make more and more profit off the interest from loans, and charges to refinance etc. Can someone tell me why they want to trust the same people with new money? Many should be in jail(not getting off the hook for their mess.) Paulson was making 40 million a year at Goldman Sachs. We know his efforts will favor the scum that caused this.

Mortimer 09-29-2008 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mortimer
Steven H. Crist.



Uh well....it's an expression of shock. I won't use the name most do as I recall my Catholic upbringing and what would happen to me should I use that name.


I'm just sick of all the expert opinion...that's all.

Danzig 09-29-2008 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
Hurt so bad that Lehman bros. gave out 2.5 billion to employee's parachutes? Spare me this bullsh-it about how they were hurt. Damn crooks. They hurt others. They hurt guys like Doc that need a loan. They want the Gov't to put up the money to loan him. Money they would have if they had written safer loans, and not artificially driven up housing prices(to make more n' more interest.) I can't support giving people in this industry any adult level responsibilities. They are selfish greedy lying children. I don't trust them to do anything but repeat the same theft again. They artificially increased housing prices to make more and more profit off the interest from loans, and charges to refinance etc. Can someone tell me why they want to trust the same people with new money? Many should be in jail(not getting off the hook for their mess.) Paulson was making 40 million a year at Goldman Sachs. We know his efforts will favor the scum that caused this.

but isn't the fbi investigating many of these firms now? i'm thinking enron-type prosecution for those responsible...or at least, one can hope.

SCUDSBROTHER 09-29-2008 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig
you don't pay a car note, own a house with a mortgage? i have very little debt myself, but i have some all the same. you can make debt work for you-i mean, who can save the tens of thousands of dollars it takes to buy a house so as to avoid a mortgage?
and go tell all the autoworkers they're all out of work, as no one can borrow. yeah, that'll make their day.
and everyone who has a 401k is in the stock market to some degree.

I keep fixing up my '87 Honda Civic(actually it's a very popular model,) and 2000 Ford Focus. Most new cars are overpriced, and most people can't afford them. So, they get loans. If they didn't get loans, then car prices would be lower. Cars would have to be sold for what people can afford(rather than what they can get somebody to give them a loan for.) Houses would never have been as expensive if prices hadn't been pushed up artificially by mortgage companies wanting to make more n' more interest n' fees off loans they shouldn't have offered. Now, it's a bad thing that people have to live within their means? I don't think so. Fewer loans will result in lower prices, and you wouldn't have to always pay a bunch of money to loan companies. If only reasonable loans were made, then houses would be more affordable. We have to get off the easy credit baby bottle. That's what this really is all about, and people don't want to give that baby bottle up easily. We must do that. I'm not talking about stuff like student loans. I mean car loans, house loans, and high interest credit cards.

SCUDSBROTHER 09-29-2008 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig
but isn't the fbi investigating many of these firms now? i'm thinking enron-type prosecution for those responsible...or at least, one can hope.


Enron was about the executives cashing in their company stock at such a rate that the employee's stock was about worthless. This Savings and Loan stuff isn't about ripping off their employees. It's about knowingly making bad loans, and it was widespread. Anytime something is widespread, the punishment isn't as interesting to authorities. I doubt they punish these people for their greed. Matter of fact, they can't wait to pass this bill, and pay them for their bad loans.

pgardn 09-29-2008 06:34 PM

I just want money to be able to flow.
I do not want to see children and older folks hurt by this.
Some of the older folks live on fixed incomes that rely
on a mixture of stocks and bonds being sold. I dont want
them to suffer.

I do not want to see poorer folks with kids to raise lose jobs
because the economy grinds to a halt. Its already tough enough. Jobs
are going away every month now. This will not help.

We got to free up money. If every one just wraps their arms around
what little they may have, and hunker down... Time for Coop vegetable
gardens and chickens in the back yard. Worked in college. People well off
will not starve.

I have to believe some sort of bill comes through so that
money does not to stagnate and rot.

dalakhani 09-29-2008 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
Enron was about the executives cashing in their company stock at such a rate that the employee's stock was about worthless. This Savings and Loan stuff isn't about ripping off their employees. It's about knowingly making bad loans, and it was widespread. Anytime something is widespread, the punishment isn't as interesting to authorities. I doubt they punish these people for their greed. Matter of fact, they can't wait to pass this bill, and pay them for their bad loans.

Do you realize that there are plenty of GOOD loans that are stopping up the system right now?

SCUDSBROTHER 09-29-2008 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani
Do you realize that there are plenty of GOOD loans that are stopping up the system right now?

I'm so tired of this bulls-h-i-t . Fact=somebody made a loan that somebody quit on. Sell whatever asset they over-valued, and stop begging others to buy the loan on this asset(that you say may eventually go up to the value the loan was made for.) You say we don't understand. I understand your industry was greedy, and deserved to get their butt kicked, and now they want to gather up their riches, and run off (if only the Gov't will help them get rid of the mistakes they made.) I don't want to do that. FCK Wallstreet. We need money injected for well made loans etc.? Fine, but don't have the same crooks give out the loans. That is stupid. People want loans with taxpayer money? Have the Government make loans to citizens, and companies, but people in your industry have gotten away with this crap too long to just keep using them to give the money out that way. They want Government money? Watch every fkn penny of it. Every penny should be regulated, and the loans given won't be to make interest. They will be made to "free up the credit supply." We have a credit crisis? Fine give out loans, but don't have the same people involved. Banish them from being involved with distributing this money.

dalakhani 09-29-2008 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
I'm so tired of this bulls-h-i-t . Fact=somebody made a loan that somebody quit on. Sell whatever asset they over-valued, and stop begging others to buy the loan on this asset(that you say may eventually go up to the value the loan was made for.) You say we don't understand. I understand your industry was greedy, and deserved to get their butt kicked, and now they want to gather up their riches, and run off (if only the Gov't will help them get rid of the mistakes they made.) I don't want to do that. FCK Wallstreet. We need money injected for well made loans etc.? Fine, but don't have the same crooks give out the loans. That is stupid. People want loans with taxpayer money? Have the Government make loans to citizens, and companies, but people in your industry have gotten away with this crap too long to just keep using them to give the money out that way. They want Government money? Watch every fkn penny of it. Every penny should be regulated, and the loans given won't be to make interest. They will be made to "free up the credit supply." We have a credit crisis? Fine give out loans, but don't have the same people involved. Banish them from being involved with distributing this money.

Who do you think gave out the loans that are going bad?

SCUDSBROTHER 09-29-2008 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani
Who do you think gave out the loans that are going bad?

Whoever made the mortgage loan, or whoever now owns it, should sell the asset the loan was made for. This whole bulls-h-i-t you're purveying is disgusting. You don't want any blame on your greedy industry that caused this. You just want a fix. Take taxpayer money, and somehow it will fix something. Well, it won't. Not unless you change the people involved with making the loans. The same people that Lehman Bros. gave 2.5 billion to out the door.

dalakhani 09-29-2008 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
Whoever made the mortgage loan, or whoever now owns it, should sell the asset the loan was made for. This whole bulls-h-i-t you're purveying is disgusting. You don't want any blame on your greedy industry that caused this. You just want a fix. Take taxpayer money, and somehow it will fix something. Well, it won't. Not unless you change the people involved with making the loans. The same people that Lehman Bros. gave 2.5 billion to out the door.

Are you getting defensive because you dont know what you are talking about? Before taking such a stance, it would be wise to understand the subject. Its clear that you don't.

geeker2 09-29-2008 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani
Are you getting defensive because you dont know what you are talking about? Before taking such a stance, it would be wise to understand the subject. Its clear that you don't.


SCUDS...I call distraction for you :D

SCUDSBROTHER 09-29-2008 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani
Are you getting defensive because you dont know what you are talking about? Before taking such a stance, it would be wise to understand the subject. Its clear that you don't.

The American people just told ya to fk off. Yeah, we are defensive about bailing out people that made bad loans, and hope to God we don't do it. It's not my fault ya stocks went down..fk off...People want to make money easily, but don't want to take the hit. Stocks went down. Don't put money in the damn thing, and then want to cry when it goes down. Bunch of fkn babies.

GBBob 09-29-2008 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
The American people just told ya to fk off. Yeah, we are defensive about bailing out people that made bad loans, and hope to God we don't do it. It's not my fault ya stocks went down..fk off...People want to make money easily, but don't want to take the hit. Stocks went down. Don't put money in the damn thing, and then want to cry when it goes down. Bunch of fkn babies.

Scuds..I'm sorry brother..but ya' gotta' open up your mind a little. It's not all black and white like Andruw Jones

dalakhani 09-29-2008 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by geeker2
SCUDS...I call distraction for you :D

Okay you want yet another explanation amongst the many that have been given on this subject to people who just don't get it? Do you want me to lay out what happens to a loan from cradle to grave? Do you want me to attempt to explain what a CDO is? What mark to market rules are? Do you want me to explain why a bank that services a loan probably doesnt own the paper and why that makes it hard to do a "work out" plan?

All of this has already been said and we still have those that want to talk about s and l's and "banks" doing crooked loans.

So if you guys want to continue on this path of blame without actually understanding where the blame belongs then continue. Frankly, geeker, this is beyond frustrating.

pgardn 09-29-2008 08:59 PM

This is kind of neat.
You can find how your representative voted and those in other states.
Just move your mouse on the little squares. Very cool.

http://www.nytimes.com/ref/washingto...urrentRoll=674

SCUDSBROTHER 09-29-2008 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani
Are you getting defensive because you dont know what you are talking about? Before taking such a stance, it would be wise to understand the subject. Its clear that you don't.


Well, we both support OBAMA. Just how do you expect him to help send people to college etc. if the money goes to bail out your greedy industry? How we gunna fix our infrastructure? Go ahead. Keep living off credit and see where it gets us. I'M so stupid huh? But I am the one that doesn't have my money in stocks that are going down. My money is in FIDC INSURED ACCOUNTS that are all under the limit they will protect. Now tell me why I should want to give up the value of those dollars to bail out your sorry industry? You want to make my money worth half a Euro? How low you want the value of a dollar to go?

dalakhani 09-29-2008 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
Well, we both support OBAMA. Just how do you expect him to help send people to college etc. if the money goes to bail out your greedy industry? How we gunna fix our infrastructure? Go ahead. Keep living off credit and see where it gets us. I'M so stupid huh? But I am the one that doesn't have my money in stocks that are going down. My money is in FIDC INSURED ACCOUNTS that are all under the limit they will protect. Now tell me why I should want to give up the value of those dollars to bail out your sorry industry? You want to make my money worth half a Euro? How low you want the value of a dollar to go?

I didnt call you stupid.

You win.

geeker2 09-29-2008 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani
Okay you want yet another explanation amongst the many that have been given on this subject to people who just don't get it? Do you want me to lay out what happens to a loan from cradle to grave? Do you want me to attempt to explain what a CDO is? What mark to market rules are? Do you want me to explain why a bank that services a loan probably doesnt own the paper and why that makes it hard to do a "work out" plan?

All of this has already been said and we still have those that want to talk about s and l's and "banks" doing crooked loans.

So if you guys want to continue on this path of blame without actually understanding where the blame belongs then continue. Frankly, geeker, this is beyond frustrating.


DALA I feel your pain and sense your frustration..I too hate those damn DEM's. Just hang in there soon John & Sarah will be in the White House and all will be well.....now relax and look at a playboy magazine - something both sexes can enjoy! :)

SCUDSBROTHER 09-29-2008 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GBBob
Scuds..I'm sorry brother..but ya' gotta' open up your mind a little. It's not all black and white like Andruw Jones

I keep hearing people want to protect the price of their stock by giving away taxpayer money. That's why you're hearing people crying. They want to protect their stocks. Don't buy stocks unless you can afford to have them go down. Fact is they voted against this Socialism for the irresponsible.

SCUDSBROTHER 09-29-2008 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani
I didnt call you stupid.

You win.

Answer th question. What is he gunna have left to spend?

Fact is we need to give out much, much, much less credit to people. People don't like that, but it's the truth. We need to give out some money for loans, but we can't just keep living on credit. Band aid it all you want, but we have to stop abusing credit.

dalakhani 09-29-2008 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
Answer th question. What is he gunna have left to spend?

Fact is we need to give out much, much, much less credit to people. People don't like that, but it's the truth. We need to give out some money for loans, but we can't just keep living on credit. Band aid it all you want, but we have to stop abusing credit.

:) I like you scuds.

Go dodgers!!!!

SCUDSBROTHER 09-29-2008 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani
:) I like you scuds.

Go dodgers!!!!

Gov't is broke. We keep borrowing from the Chinese etc. Where we gunna get this 700 billion? We gunna print it? Either way it's gunna dilute the value of the dollar. Most of these people yelling about doing this bill are people losing money in stocks,stock funds, and 401 k plans. All came with risk that people blew off.

Mortimer 09-29-2008 10:19 PM

Steven H. Crist already!!


SHUT UP!!





YOU'VE MADE YOUR FRIGGIN' POSITION KNOWN TO EVERY SCHEMING MORTGAGE CONSULTANT HERE!

jwkniska 09-29-2008 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
Fact is we need to give out much, much, much less credit to people. People don't like that, but it's the truth. We need to give out some money for loans, but we can't just keep living on credit. Band aid it all you want, but we have to stop abusing credit.

100% true, and the worst of it all is that the people that can afford it the least are the ones that get more and more of it. sooner or later the banks are going to have to deal with it, as they're going to have to stop lending to people that don't have any collateral and don't deserve it, and the banks that want to take the risk and pick the wrong people to lend to... DESERVE to be run out of business when they default.

Danzig 09-30-2008 06:12 AM

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26950483/

doing nothing seems to be working well. :rolleyes:

Danzig 09-30-2008 07:06 AM

then again....there's this article:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122272238714287459.html

dalakhani 09-30-2008 08:06 AM

Libor up 431 bps
 
At an all time high of 6.88. This is really bad...

This is not about liquidity anymore...its about solvency. Banks will not lend to each other except at ridiculous rates. Why? Because banks don't trust the other banks not to default and because everyone is hording cash. Vicious cycle.

Remind anyone of something?

Danzig 09-30-2008 08:18 AM

i saw earlier that the russian market suspended trading.
this isn't just about the u.s. economy, this whole mess is far-reaching in its implications. i don't think a lot of people realize just what kind of effect our economy has on the global economy.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.