oj was found not guilty in a criminal trial, but found guilty in a civil case-- he was found to be responsible for the two murders.

well, don't you think you ought to 'know what he's done' before deciding he's been railroaded?? how can you conclude he's been railroaded, if you don't even know what the case is about?

I'm kinda convinced he did commit the murders...but I'm awful naive...I guess the civil conviction tipped it for me.

Did he mention if he's still looking for the real culprit?

Dala....I don't know much about you...are you really a Black person?

I'm Welch..is the reason I ask.

We go back a long way with Black people.

what drug are you doing?
 

the only reason he got off was the prosecutors lead detective was quoting as saying he would do anything to frame a black person. hes charming yeah I guess when he doesn't have a knife in his hand. Buddy get a grip, bet you asked him for a autograph. Maybe you were with him when he went to get his memorabilia!

Nope...dont do the autograph thing. He was found not guilty. I am american...i believe in our justice system.

He was found not guilty in the criminal trial so in the eyes of the law. He is NOT a felon and there is enough reasonable doubt to suggest he may NOT have done it. Im not saying he did or didnt. But you cant say for a FACT that he did.

Thats my point.

Didnt say that. I merely said that it was a FACT that he was found not guilty in a court of law.

Not found "guilty" but found to be responsible which is a totally different thing.

In my opinion, with the evidence presented, it appears that he most likely did it. But who is to say that the evidence wasnt tainted? Still waiting for those wmd's in Iraq.

No Wmd's In Iraq = Oj Innocent

I tihnk since he admitted he cut his finger...badly....just a few hours before the night the murders took place..yet had not the foggiest how he cut that finger....that's kinda strange.

Now that's not tainted...that is fact from Simpson. I know it was not entered into the trial.




But it's kinda strange.

WHAT!!





ror!

Cochrane was the smart guy...Darden was a nimrod!

Kardashian got O.J. off

i just want to state for the record, that on this issue, or any issue really, I am 100% behind Kardashian.

Well I would certainly hope so!

Say Pillow...is that BrownSugar?

I believe so.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Him?

I don't think it's a him.

Oh yeah and OJ can burn in hell.

:eek:

You need a spanking.:D

He was found not guilty in the criminal case.
That does not mean he is innocent,
this is a very different outcome.

The guy cut up two people in a rage.
This is my assessment. I believe the probability
that I am correct is very high having watched the
trial and looking at the complete distortion of evidence
and the crappy job done by the prosecution.
Slick lawyers duped a frightened jury in a racially charged case.

I sorta have a hard time believing they charged him with
anything in Vegas though. Evidence, witnesses...
all lacking and very suspect based on what I
have read and seen.

Very fair. Very well said.

Whoopie! NEXT!

Glad u posted this. One crime committed, allegedly, doesn't have anything to do with the other. U wouldn't take a guy that's been charged with tax evasion, gotten off, and then say that because u think he was guilty of that, he should not be treated fairly in any subsequent cases. Whether or not u think he was guilty in the murders is beside the point. He didn't do anything that any of us wouldn't have done in the same situation. He had the money and the ability to hire the best lawyers out there and it was them that got OJ off. OJ didn't get himself off. Most important to me is that he should get the same rights any other citizen would get under the constitution. He was tried in a court and found not guilty. Making him guilty in this case to make him pay for the last one is not right.

Sometimes I'm amazed by the things I read on here. One of the things that make this country great is our constitution. So many people have fought and died for us to have the rights and freedoms we have now. It's amazing to me the little amount of respect it gets these days.

Hang 'im.

ror!!




Ya baby!!..spank me honey...you know I love it when you do that!

that's true!!

Just as in the Vick case, I'm being accused of defending someone when I'm not defending him at all. Did I say at any point that he's not guilty? No. I am only speaking to the fact that everyone deserves the same rights and protections, whether it's you, me, or OJ. You also might notice that I didn't chime in on my feelings about the murder and whether I think he's guilty or innocent there. Why should I? Look at what you said, "his being guilty of committing those murders should be part of this discussion." That's fine except for one important thing.........he was tried in a court of law and found not guilty. Whether or not you believe that was the wrong decision is irrelevant now. According to the records, by him being found not guilty, it would be absolutely wrong to use that past crime to establish any kind of pattern of behavior for him. In my opinion, that makes the murders a non-issue here. This case should only be about whether or not he committed THIS crime and this crime only.

speaking of vick...that one tested positive for marijuana earlier this month. oops.

transparent only that he respects the constitution and our justice system. If a man is found "not guilty" in a criminal court of law on one crime, why should that be even considered when judging him on a totally seperate matter?

How does that make logical sense?

But that is not how the justice system works. If I were tried (and acquitted) for robbing a bank ten years ago why should it have that anything to do with say a manslaughter charge 12 years later? What if i were wrongly charged for the first crime?

I can only speak to what i know. Do i think he probably killed those people? Yes, I do. Do i know for sure? No i dont. Neither do you! There is reasonable doubt you, me and everyone else might be wrong...but it still has nothing to do with this case.

Look at the facts for this case as what they are. Check out the witnesses. A little shaky huh?