![]() |
Oh, and the punishment should somehow require Belichick to give a hug of apology to Mangini after he shoves a cameraman.
|
Morty is rolling in his grave.
|
Quote:
you know like ha-ha!! Kinda like the Jets offense? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I can't believe there are 45 posts about this.
It's not as though you can gain a real meaningfull edge in the game by doing what NE was caught doing. I would think it is something that might help them against that team when they meet them down the line. To me, it's much ado about nothing. Though, it goes to show what silly lengths NE will go to in order to try and gain the ever so slightest of advantages. |
Quote:
THE PATRIOTS PLAY TWO GAMES AT NEW YORK JETS NEXT YEAR!!!!! The punishment is both financial and psychological by giving a playing advantage to the team wronged while avoiding the dreaded punishing by draft picks which just means the Patriots use that money on free agents. Mr B would never really serve a suspension as he would still manage the team secretly. If you force the Pats to lose millions in concessions and parking revenue plus try and concentrate before the hostile crowd from hell X 2 you have a quid pro quo where the offense occured. A home game is huge!!! |
I think the Patriots offense should have to give the Jets their plays beforehand in the next two games. Picture Brady at the line..."I'm going to throw it to that guy..."
Patriots still win by 14... |
Quote:
|
Glenn Foley?
|
Quote:
:D |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It is a big deal. Every team and coach knows this is ILLEGAL. No its not a crime outside of the game so comparing it to what Pacman does is irrelevant (not to say you were). No way they take a game away from Patriots, I just wish they would. That would have a huge effect on Belechick. |
Quote:
|
Interesting penalty
Coach must pay 500k fine Team must pay 250k fine If they make the playoffs they lose their first round pick in 08 |
Quote:
They put a bit of a hurt on them if they succeed. Kinda neat idea. |
Quote:
hopefully the nut cases demanding a forfeit can untangle their panties and get back to life now. |
Really its just the draft pick, Kraft will cover the fine. First round pick is a big hit though.
|
Quote:
The NFL missed an opportunity to hold Kraft responsible for his team's sins...that was a mistake. The Patriots will find a way to pay Bill's fine and the #1 will just have his money spent on a upper level free agent. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Different regime. Safe to say that if the Merriman antics happened this yr, there would be a total different set of punishment levied down. |
Kraft pays that fine its easy. Either as an end of season bonus, or in his next contract. Kraft is not stupid, there are so many ways to get around it with him not actually "paying" the fine.
|
Quote:
|
Yes, they do, its san fransico's.
|
Quote:
POCKET CHANGE to them |
Quote:
within the year. The whole thing is a joke and mark my words Coach Bill already knows who else has crossed this line and there will be more "announcement" of new violations that will come from "a source close to the NFL" etc etc |
Quote:
|
Yes its a big deal. Just because a good deal of people do it does not make it right. Videotaping signs can be a huge deal. If you know what defense they are calling in, you have a massive advantage. It matters not who else or how many have done it. It's illegal to do it and they were caught, they deserve whatever they get.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I still think the whole thing is overblown. I dont think there is a massive advantage. There is only so many things a defense can do. Most of what they do is to react to what the offense does. I suppose Indy is cheating too since Peyton seems to change plays about every play. |
I wish I could say that the reason the Patriots beat the Rams was because they cheated (although there were something that they didn't show on camera - the receivers were blantantly being held) but it was Get sMartz.
and the completely fabricated tuck rule |
Quote:
$750,000 in fines and loss of a 1st round draft pick. i agree. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
At least the antisoundbite wasn't hit with this penalty..... http://sports.aol.com/story/_a/mclar...13151409990023 |
Here's the problem: They all say it had little to no impact on Sunday's game, so why was Belicheat doing it? You know he will not explain what they were doing and why. But we are all supposed to believe that it didn't help, much?
If the Commisioner is truly interested in the integrity of the game, he should have forced a full explanation from Belichicken. Basically, it's "we have no comment, but take my word for it that it was no big deal". Well, I have a big problem taking Belichump's word for it, especially when he's not talking. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
:D |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.