![]() |
Quote:
but then, i'd add him to any tri's before i added curlin... |
Quote:
the last furlong will be issue with him, but horses best performances are (I believe) usually when they are at the upmost limit of their stamina..btw, you see whose son won the French 2000 Guineas today. |
looks like chelokee is going to the barbaro stakes, rather than the preakness.
hadn't seen about the french 2k brock, but i take it a danzig colt won?? |
Quote:
yep Astronomer Royal, big shock though. Coolmore had 5 in it, he was at least 4 string, if not 5th..thats his breeding! Danzig(USA) (7.9f) - Sheepscot(USA) (Easy Goer (USA)) |
holy crap, 33-1!! just went to racing post to check out the story....wow!
maybe that win, and with three of his finishing in the top four, will ease some of o'briens pain over losing holy roman emperor to the shed. |
Just read this:
King of the Roxy trainer Todd Pletcher hinted Sunday he might have another horse for the 1 3-16-mile Preakness. Pletcher, who went 0-for-5 in the Derby to run his record in Triple Crown races to 0-for-26, would not say which 3-year-old he was considering. Any thoughts? |
Quote:
Deadly Dealer maybe:confused: |
I am guessing Circular Quay.
|
Quote:
I tend to think Street Sense takes the Preakness. He is at the top of his form right now and his effort in the Derby may not have taken it all out of him. Against the Preakness field, I think that is enough to win. We'll see about the Belmont. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Maybe "Stone Cold" Soaring By??? |
Quote:
I agree with you about Hard Spun. He ran harder than SS in the Derby. I think it will be very hard for HS to repeat the race he just ran. |
I would go with either Circular Quay or Soaring By to the Preakness
Soaring By tho would be more likely to run in the Sir Barton on the undercard |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Undertaker is the best oh yeah Preakness something something... no Chelokee :( |
I figured I would comment :)
I think that SS won that race easily, and I think if Borel would have gathered him up late, people would be saying "Oh he has plenty in the stake" but because we didn't see the patented wrap up that so many jockeys use now days when a race is won easy, we think that this race took took too much out of him. I see no possibly way that Street Sense loses this race, none. He is lightly raced and just getting back to his 2 year old top, while I do see him pairing or regressing, it won't be by much. The whole rail thing is crap, if he has to go wide, he will, and he didn't ride the rail THE WHOLE race, he hit the hole like a great running back and then ducked to the rail, it is Borel's MO, not Street Senses' As far as Hard Spun, will not discredit how he ran in the Derby, it was a great run, but he was wobbly as hell down the lane, and that had the look of a gutter, no way he can take another 46.2 going that long. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I still like the Met Mile idea a little bit for CQ, but I'll take anything to make the Preakness a little more interesting than it currently looks on paper. |
Quote:
where did you read this? I can't find it. |
|
I hope CQ goes, although I sort of doubt it at this point. That would make it a much more interesting race.
With Hard Spun, that ridiculous Lukas horse, and the other speed....it seems like it would be a good fit for Quay. |
Any Given Saturday?
Maybe Pletcher feels like he didn't take enough of my money Derby Day! |
Quote:
thanks! |
Quote:
NT |
Quick look at the Belmont Work Tab:
Saturday: King of the Roxy: 6F in 1:14:92 (1/2). Looks like he worked in company with Sunriver, who was clocked at the same distance and time. Soaring By: 5F in 1:01:02 (3/13) Looks like a bunch more Pletcher's worked Sunday, but none of the Derby 5. Are they all at Belmont? |
From Brisnet.com
Hutcheson S. (G2) hero and Santa Anita Derby (G1) runner-up Kingoftheroxy, who worked six furlongs in 1:14 4/5 on Saturday, went straight back to the track on Sunday. The Team Valor colorbearer galloped 1 1/2 miles at Belmont Park, with Pletcher praising his appearance as "outstanding." "We'll just basically gallop up to the race," he added. When asked if Kingoftheroxy would be his only starter in Preakness 132, Pletcher didn't give a categorical answer. "That's my decision as of this moment," the three-time Eclipse Award winner said. In response to the inevitable follow-up question, whether that was subject to change, Pletcher said, "Always." Pletcher would not be drawn into naming his second possible entrant, saying only that the decision would be made on Wednesday. |
wonder why he's being so coy about it.
|
Eh. There's a better chance that he doesn't run anyone and we'll spend three days trying to figure it out.
|
Quote:
NT |
Quote:
|
Quote:
NT |
Quote:
"The Green Monkey Stakes" |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Edge has become Vince's favorite, much like his son-in-law Triple HHH... so it was no surprise that Edge gets the belt. Mr.Kennedy was supposed to have a "major" injury...but it wasn't as bad as they thought. The "Taker" though, will be MIA for several months. It's too bad also that Chelokee will be in the "Barbaro" Stakes instead of the Preakness... he was the only real threat to the Derby Top "3". |
Quote:
--Dunbar |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It seems to me that horses didn't learn to bounce until Ragozin invented the theory. |
Quote:
I'm not eliminating the possibility that they run huge races back-to-back. But considering Nafzger's Derby-or-bust strategy and considering how strenous Hard Spun's race in the Derby looked TO ME, I think they both are vulnerable to regression and hence, why I don't like them in the Preakness. Hope that you didn't cringe reading that. |
Street Sense worked out a perfect trip in the Derby, so if he should run slightly worse in the Preakness it won't be because he bounced, it will almost certainly be due to circumstances. Hard Spun, while setting a strong pace that killed the roaches chasing him, was still able to dictate the pace in the Derby. Should the speed horses in the Preakness force him into the role of a chaser, or worse - embroil him in a speed duel, he will also most likely run worse due to race dynamics. Both situations could very possibly lead to what a simplistic analysis will call a bounce or regression when in fact it will be a very simple result of differing race dynamics.
This is very much the problem with the bounce excuse. Since the sheets don't take pace into account they explain performances incorrectly. While I am willing to admit regression is possible, though highly unlikely, far more horses that are considered to have " bounced " actually got favorable setups one day and then unfavorable ones the next. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:12 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.