Why do you think it is a little harsh? I know stuff happens as well. But, someone has to take the responsibility. To me, the trainer is the one that needs to be held accountable. You could also have something in place for big operations where the assistant trainer is running the barn while the main trainer is at the main stable. For example, Pletcher could have a string in Cali but he would be in New York. The trainer over seeing the operation in Cali would be responsible for any positive tests. The training outfit has to say that they horses are running under the assistants name on behalf of Pletcher. There is always policy that can be well written to address all situations.

Dude, you are cracking me up. Now sure what to think of someone who can come up with a "scoldering coat hanger shoved up their pisshole."

yeah, those accidental postives of things like lidocaine from a foot salve for cracked feet definitely demand high profile punishment.
Calling for a life time ban on any trainer with a postive test without differentiating between accidental overages of no performance enhancing drugs, and flat out juicing is one of the dumbest things I ever heard.

Well see, if a trainer does the testing on his own then he/she will know that the horse is clean before the horse races. The trainer will know what is in the horse so therefore the trainer can make sure that everything is out of the horses system.

eurobounce in 2008!!!

There is a huge difference between an overage of a legal drug that was withdrawn in time according to the vet's instructions and lingered, and a guy stepping into a stall and "mainlining" a horse with a hopper on race day.
EPO also doesnt "accidentally" make its way into a horses system. Its not like EPO is like Clen or BUte which can be given quite legally and sometimes lingers.
People who talk about lifetime bans on stuff like this usually have no idea what they are talking about.

Just realize how expensive that is and that the cost would be directly billed and passed on to the owners in the day rate. When you get your first bills for this on your two horses, lemme know what you think about your own idea ok?

The horses that only a percentage in do not run on drugs. The trainer doesnt even give the horse any type of pain medication--maybe that is why they arent winning. The ownership group got together (and the trainer is also in the group) and we decided that no drugs should be administered. Now, if the trainer needs to give the horse something then it is written that the horse must wait 32 days after the medicine was administered before the horse can be entered into a race. One of our horses got loose and slif across the pavement at the track. She cut herself up pretty good. The vet gave her some meds for the pain and to fight off any type of infection. The horse wasnt entered in a race until 48 days passed since the last dose was given. I feel that mistakes can be prevented by taking the necessary pre-cautions. Pre-race testing is a precaution that can be used.

I do not get bills. It is a one time flat rate. And again, if you arent giving your horse anything then you wont need to test. If you do give your horse something, just make sure you give it enough time to get out of the system. The point is to make the game fair and legal. What is your suggestions. I hear you making fun of mine but I haven't heard you come up with an idea.

Thats because I like to think that there is no "one idea" that can be standardized in a theoretical argument like this one.
The best way to go would be to regulate the vets ok? The notion that these folks have on here most of the time where the trainer is injecting horses is quite funny. Most of these guys don't have any idea what does what. You honestly think they take a syringe themselves and fill it full of something and inject it? I'm trying to picture some trainers I know reading a chemistry book and then trying to get the stuff and fill a syringe and know when and where and how to give the stuff and its pretty funny!!!!! Some of these guys still don't know how to work email!!!!!!!!
The vets do the work, not the trainers.

This made me laugh. I am trying to picture someone like Cole Norman with a bunson burner, syringe and a book. That is funny right there.

I can see where regulating the vet can be a viable solution. But who is the person that calls the vet in? I am sure the trainer would like to know what the vet is doing. I am sure the vet gives the trainer a bill. So the trainer has to have some idea as to what is going on here. You cant just turn a blind eye to what the vet is doing and put all the blame on the vet.

I think in Europe horses do not run on lasix or bute. I could be wrong. If someone knows for sure, please let me know.

I was actually trying to picture someone else, but had the same sort of visual. Like the guy sitting there trying to read this chemistry book and reading out loud and completely mispronouncing the names of the stuff hes reading about. Then I'm trying to picture him online at the store trying to buy syringes and trying to order the stuff hes mispronouncing.
Then I'm picturing him trying to fill a syringe with the correct dosage and screwing it up horribly and injecting the horse and having it fall dead on the ground like the scene in Animal House, and then him running away like the guys in Animal House after the horse dropped dead. Thats pretty much what it would look like.

Freaking awesome with the Animal House analogy.

I also think that in some states the horse has to actually bleed in either a workout or race before lasix can be administered. I think this is the case but I could be wrong.

Well I'm picturing his asst's there next to him standing guard like Bluto and Dday and going "HOLY ****" just like they did when the horse hits the ground with a thump. Then them running as fast as they can through the stable area.