I said all the term, all stakes in my suggestion comment before I saw that race 3 was stakes. I decided not to mention it in my race numbers to play. It wasn't consecutive with the others so I left it out. Still though I'll stick with the all stakes contest. Just not every stakes on the card.

IH, I'll be glad to post the threads, but want to make sure I understand your intent. Do you mean your original call of GP Races 4 through 14 to which we now add Race 12 from Oaklawn, the Arkansas Derby?

Sorry for my being dense.

IH

PLEASE CLARIFY EXACTLY WHICH 12 .

WHEN I ADDED THE G P STAKES 6-7-8-9-10-11-12-13-14 PLUS
OAKLAWN 9-10-11-12 :eek:
I GET 13
What am I missing :eek:

My reply is that it would be the GP card starting with race 4 and adding the ARK Derby.

That's my decision based on a ROI perspective that has to include rolling exotics.

IH

Got it. Thank you and sorry for any confusion. None of us wanted to step on your prerogative.

Not perceived as such.

After I win the Points this weekend we can discuss a SA-Aqu-Kee stakes card.

IH

If you feel that way, I'm rooting for you to repeat.

💰 Roi Questiin 💰 For The Quiet 🤫 One

Are We Purrrrmitted To Include R1-2-3 Gp In Roi 🙏
~~~~~~~~~ Or Only R4–14

Yes, as we customarily handle it, you may include any race at GP in your ROI, but ONLY the Arkansas Derby from Oaklawn.

As I have chosen a single venue card that is usually permitted, although I will defer to RQ.

And therein is the conundrum of including multiple venues races in the ROI part of the contest. Rolling exotics withing continuous races would be the only wagers permitted. I would not accept asking RQ to score multiple venues.