![]() |
Quote:
But he was a very good horse. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'd say Justify.
|
Quote:
I think BTW put it well saying he was unreliable. I don’t ever remember people talking about him a certain way. But his fragility was well known. When he was right, good luck beating him. When he wasn’t...well he was very beatable. I’m just not sure how when you’re one of three horses ever to win the Whitney multiple times and the other two are Kelso and Discovery you can be overrated. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Recents include Tacitus the under achieving winner of not many. Cloud Computing who benefitted from bad rides from the opposition . Going back a little Empire maker and Easy Goer. Ran ok in New York, but failed on the road and vs top competition, like Sunday Silence.
|
Quote:
|
Rock Hard Ten
|
Orb
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
So much more was assumed I think just because of that. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
He only started 11 times. I was in CA at the time and he was talked about as being a SUPER HORSE. Need a much more extensive resume for that. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Horses like Smarty Jones, Alysheba, Point Given, even Real Quiet, these horses don't have the status in history that Justify does because he won the TC but they didn't have the advantage of facing the patsies he did. A horse like Risen Star doesn't get the credit he should get because he lost the Derby to Winning Colors and Forty Niner but in my eyes, he was much better than Justify. Justify was a really good horse. No question about that but I think the accomplishment makes people think he's better than some horses that didn't accomplish the same thing because they faced better competition. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.