![]() |
Alot of factors played into each of them losing, so not sure if you can gain a measure of who was closer, but I will try...
In the Belmont, Stewart Elliot either didnt try to settle Smarty Jones down or just couldnt and Jerry Bailey and Alex Solis made runs at Smarty to push the pace at around the 1/2 or 3/4 mile marker. Don't know about Solis, but Bailey pretty much said he would do that, one of the old addages being they dont want to see a Triple Crown won if they arent on the horses back. Never understood that. I mean obviously you want to win with your horse and you need to put the effort out there, but that was no way Bailey's best way to win the race, so we can pretty much say he sabotaged it to an extent. That being said, Elliot had Smarty pushing the pace way too early and should have ridden Smarty Jones like Jeremy Rose rode Afleet Alex in the Belmont the next year. Afleet Alex had one major thing working against him that he had no control over and another that could have been controlled. The inclusion of Spanish Chestnut in the race set a blistering pace that cooked the entire field. Spanish Chestnut is one step above a quarter horse in my book. All to get Bandini home, right? What did Bandini finish 19th? What a travesty. Rose was artfully darting through traffic and may have won had he not dove to the rail, which was dead all day. Really tough to seperate the two. I think Afleet Alex was closer and the better of the two horses. Both great horses with great stories. It is a shame neither of them could do it, and that injuries finished them both off early. |
Stevepopyak,
That's exactly right. Wimbledon was scratched, and Bailey approached John Servis. Trying to persuade him to let him ride Smarty in the Derby. Servis stayed with Stew Elliot, and I think Bailey really hated that. I think he resented not having a Derby mount. So he tried to bury the horse and the connections that could've helped him... Suffolk, The point you made about Bailey's thought process. I mean the "if I ain't riding him" I don't want him to win attitude- I could see him saying that. In his book, he repeatedly mentions about with the quick reirements of horses these days, the mmarketing and stardom should be put more on the jocks than on the horses. I agree with him to an extent, but the Smarty Belmont was not the way to emphasize your point lol. I do remember after Prado won on Birdstone that day, he was so apologetic in the interview after winning. So i don't think Prado shared Bailey's view... |
I thought that Prado really handled that win well, as did Zito. I remember one or the other saying something to the extent that the worst thing would have been for no one to show up against Smarty.
|
Quote:
Just my opinion...but the "class act" that day was Birdstone's owner, Mary Lou Whitney. She said soothing words to all those that had wished so much for Smarty. She's a total class act. Then when her horse won the Travers, it just seemed like good karma she deserved came right back on her. as far as the topic, both were really nice horses. I loved AA for what his connections did for neuroblastoma ( cause it kills far too many kids, my nephew included)...the leomonade stands were awe inspiring. But my heart belongs to Smarty. He almost gave us what we've hoped for. Very game...and fought to his last heart beat. |
Smarty. I am going to meet him in the spring. :)
|
errr... I am still bitter against Bailey for that ride.
I was driving a friend to the airport this past Wednesday and he got a call from Mr Jerry Bailey while in my car. After he hung up I said, "I dont like Jerry and I will never like him after that ride in the Belmont causing Smarty Jones to lose the triple crown. He thought I was nuts for still being bitter, but I am from the PHILLY area and I will always be bitter... whether the Eagles or Smarty Jones... Anywayz, both Smarty and Afleet Alex were the class of their triple crown division in their respective years. I would have been happy to have seen them both as TC winners, and I cant differenciate between one or the other because they both had bad trips on the races they lost an probably would both be TC winners if otherwise. |
well, smarty ran a game second in his tc loss, while alex was third in his....also, alex wasn't 'ganged up on' while smarty was...and then of course smarty won the biggest of the three. i think smarty was the better horse, never an off day in his two year (and too short) career.
|
Quote:
great first post, Heather! Thanks for the article, too, it sure is a good one. Hope you enjoy the board. |
Quote:
Smarty, the difference to me is he wanted it, Alex gave up in the Derby. |
Quote:
http://nebraska.statepaper.com/vnews...=40c58d8496a95 |
I'm going to go with the Smarty camp here. This was an undefeated animal who won most efforts by open lengths. Birdstone was a 3 time G1 winner and received the gift of the pace duel and Stewie's ride. Even with that, Smarty was 6 lengths clear of the 3rd.
That said, I think Alex would have won the Derby if he had stayed wider. The rail was dead all week at Churchill and Alex made his move down inside. Watch the tape when Rose reaches even terms with the other two inside the 1/8th pole. Rose goes with the right handed whip, Alex goes in a little and slows. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Smarty was unfairly sabotaged in the Belmont, but Afleet Alex ran on a dead rail for most of the Derby, and they both missed the TC by just a length. I'm gonna give Smarty the slight nod, because the circumstance that cost him the TC is a much more tangible than the one that cost 'Alex. While I don't dispute that the rail was dead that day at CD, who knows how much it cost him and HOW dead it was? Smarty, on the other hand, was clearly sabotaged and it certainly cost him the TC in my eyes. Very good post. |
Quote:
unfairly sabotaged? Ive never heard of anything as ridiculous ateam. the other jocks tried to do what they could to get him beat, but thats not unfair. thats racing. its not lke Zito or the whitneys paid off the other contestants. He got beat by a better horse. A Travers winner. no different than when VGallop beat RQuiet or when Touch Gold beat SCharm. Repent |
Quote:
same rhetoric the smarty party always uses, and they never say anything of substance. The Stone and lucky jones met one time on a dry track, and The Stone beat him. lucky needed a wet track to beat him. and Bailey would not lower himself to riding on that PA bred. he had real horses to ride. Repent |
Why should we care?
Why are we trying to even answer a question like this? It's history and it is what it is. Neither horse won the triple crown and both won two legs and fininshed in the money in the one leg that they missed.
It's already in the books. Is the real question who was better Smarty Jones or Afleet Alex? NC Tony |
Just nod and pretend to agree with Repent :rolleyes: You're not going to win this one with him, its been going on for a long time now and nothing has changed...
|
Quote:
and that Belmont run was the most courageous you have seen? lmao, did you not see PEnsign's BC Distaff win? how about any of Giants Causeway's wins during that incredible win streak? or either one of Tiznow's BCC wins? or Storm Flag Flying's BCJF win? you see, all these horses WON. lucky jones LOST. if you want to talk about amazing performances in a losing effort, check out Rock of Gibraltar's BCMile run. or Falbrav's BCTurf loss. or Swain's Dubai World Cup loss to Silver Charm. all much more impressive performances and displays of "courage". Repent |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:04 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.