Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   What Obama meant to say (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=52267)

Danzig 11-13-2013 02:33 PM

those hitler parodies are hilarious.

alysheba4 11-13-2013 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 952971)
yeah, it was you could keep it if you like it and it meets our new, minimum standards, and they continue to operate in your area.

but, health insurers will be making a lot of money, because people will be having to buy a package with all the stuff they didn't have before, don't need, and won't use. it's akin to your car insurer requiring everyone have 'full coverage' regardless of year of the vehicle, its value, etc.

its even worse, who else does the dictator want to bury. auto ins, maybe home owners insurance?

bigrun 11-13-2013 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 953882)
those hitler parodies are hilarious.

Yes they are...dan, be sure to watch mon nites Stewart and Colbert, they both did bits on 60 minutes Benghazi story apology..:D

bigrun 11-13-2013 04:12 PM

Everyone is taking hits on Obamacare...even this poor lady...why didn't they use an American woman by the way.:)

Exclusive: Obamacare's Mystery Woman Says She Fell Victim to Cyberbullies
Nov. 13, 2013.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/exclu...ry?id=20868617

Danzig 11-13-2013 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alysheba4 (Post 953885)
its even worse, who else does the dictator want to bury. auto ins, maybe home owners insurance?

oh, auto and home insurers would LOVE to have this kind of mandate.
can you imagine, having to carry every type of coverage, regardless of year, make and model of vehicle? good lord, the premiums they'd collect...
health insurers won't be buried, they're loving this-who do you think wrote the law?!

Danzig 11-13-2013 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigrun (Post 953886)
Yes they are...dan, be sure to watch mon nites Stewart and Colbert, they both did bits on 60 minutes Benghazi story apology..:D

i saw it.

huge ads i'm sure leading up to that episode, and then 60 mins buries the mea culpa at the end of the show.
:rolleyes:

but, it's like espn, and all the other news outlets-what harm do they suffer when wrong? none. none at all.
but i like that lindsey graham is forging ahead anyway...:rolleyes: i can't stand that guy, and LOVE when stewart does his version of graham. hilarious!

bigrun 11-13-2013 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 953906)
i saw it.

huge ads i'm sure leading up to that episode, and then 60 mins buries the mea culpa at the end of the show.
:rolleyes:

but, it's like espn, and all the other news outlets-what harm do they suffer when wrong? none. none at all.
but i like that lindsey graham is forging ahead anyway...:rolleyes: i can't stand that guy, and LOVE when stewart does his version of graham. hilarious!

:D Yeah, does it like a southern belle...My son lives in Columbia and mocks him, calls him a half a sissy.:)

dellinger63 11-14-2013 07:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigrun (Post 953911)
My son lives in Columbia and mocks him, calls him a half a sissy.:)

My Lord, what does he call Barney Frank? ;)

Danzig 11-14-2013 11:42 AM

http://news.msn.com/us/policy-cancel...llow-old-plans

note that the change, the ability to keep these plans, is for one year. and of course it's predicated on insurers opting to keep them in force.
good lord, bc/bs et al probably ripping their hair out over all this.

i predict that the many and sundry rules and issues will be the undoing of the law. they keep chipping out the various stones holding up this false front-it will cause the whole thing to collapse.


first rule-follow k.i.s.s. keep it simple, stupid. they didn't do that.

i'm sure everyone remembers the picture i posted with all the agencies and parties involved.
what a tangled mess. and it's not going to get better. how could it?
the only improvement would be to throw the whole damned, convoluted abortion out, and just do single payer. period.

randallscott35 11-14-2013 12:01 PM

Such a disaster of a president.

GBBob 11-14-2013 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by randallscott35 (Post 953984)
Such a disaster of a president.

:rolleyes:

Danzig 11-14-2013 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GBBob (Post 953986)
:rolleyes:

:tro:

bigrun 11-14-2013 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 953944)
My Lord, what does he call Barney Frank? ;)

A full sissy of course:zz:

dellinger63 11-14-2013 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigrun (Post 953993)
A full sissy of course:zz:

OK then :wf

randallscott35 11-14-2013 01:43 PM

Well put.

http://blog.pacificlegal.org/2013/la...ncement-means/

jms62 11-14-2013 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by randallscott35 (Post 954005)

When you let the foxes write the rules for guarding the henhouse you shouldn't be surprised when chickens start to go missing. An indictment on the entire process. Dems obviously didn't read the ****ing law that was written by lobbyists for the healthcare industry.

randallscott35 11-14-2013 01:59 PM

Yes, he seems to think the use of executive orders is limitless.

Danzig 11-14-2013 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by randallscott35 (Post 954009)
Yes, he seems to think the use of executive orders is limitless.

:rolleyes:

i guess perception is reality. he has a way to go to catch his predecessor. he's about half of bush's total right now.
everyone has a way to go to catch fdr.

Danzig 11-14-2013 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jms62 (Post 954007)
When you let the foxes write the rules for guarding the henhouse you shouldn't be surprised when chickens start to go missing. An indictment on the entire process. Dems obviously didn't read the ****ing law that was written by lobbyists for the healthcare industry.

too true.

randallscott35 11-14-2013 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 954020)
:rolleyes:

i guess perception is reality. he has a way to go to catch his predecessor. he's about half of bush's total right now.
everyone has a way to go to catch fdr.

And Bush was a dreadful President as well. Since you don't understand rule of law, I'm not going to waste my time. He thinks he can have his cake and eat it too. Unfortunately, in a three branch government, he can't execute the laws by choosing which aspects of laws to execute....Clinton would do things personally that showed he was a jerk, but he would have never done the things Obama has done.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.