Perhaps you heard he was having some issues and they were slowly working him back? Or maybe you are just insensitive to those with mental health issues. So non-liberal of you.

As you can tell, Riot just needs to have a comeback for any post anyone makes on any topic in this Politics sections. And it has to be the opposite view of any type of "conservative" view.

So I guess her "facts" can be taken as a grain of salt or however that saying goes. I mean, Jimmy Carter. Enough said.

and then there's this....


http://www.factcheck.org/2009/11/rea...ake-districts/

but she's a republican

Then she needs to do a tad bit more research than what she finds on Wikipedia.

Facts, Shmacts. Liberals don't deal in facts. Only hope and promises.

That's a good one

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=34139
For your reading pleasure!

And you think I'm going to believe an op-ed piece written by a guy under an Ann Coulter banner? Talking about being brainwashed

I knew you would get a kick out of it!:)

I'll read that if you read and believe what I'll post by Al Gore on Global Warming

:eek:

I was the one yelling "delonte, i know a good lawyer".

That is the first time I had ever seen Lebron that close (we were really close to the floor). That is a big man. I was completely in awe of him physically.

Can't get the link to work, but I guess FOX lies like everyone else. The last paragraph says it all

Mea Culpa: Fox News keeps making conservative-friendly mistakes
Jeff Bercovici
Nov 19th 2009 at 4:45PMText SizeAAAFiled under: People, Media, News Corp.
More

Every news organization makes mistakes. But when Fox News makes mistakes, they seem to tilt in a suspiciously consistent direction, favoring Republicans and conservatives over Democrats and liberals.

It happened again Wednesday, when host Gregg Jarrett, introducing a segment on Happening Now, described the "huge crowds" that were turning out to greet Sarah Palin on the promotional tour for her book, Going Rogue. "These are some of the pictures just coming into us," Jarrett said as images of Palin surrounded by throngs of supporters flashed across the screen.



While Palin may indeed be drawing big crowds, it didn't take long for liberal watchdog blogs like Think Progress and Media Matters to point out that the masses Jarrett touted on Happening Now had nothing to do with Palin's book; the footage was from a 2008 campaign rally. Called on the switcheroo, Fox blamed it on a "production error" and issued an on-air apology.

The whole thing might have gone unnoticed had it not been for an eerily similar incident last week in a much more prominent venue, Sean Hannity's primetime show. In this case, the crowd Hannity was hyping was the one that gathered to attend a rally against the healthcare bill on November 5. The footage he showed, however, was from the much larger Sept. 12 "tea parties." In that case, it was The Daily Show that blew the whistle, forcing Hannity to apologize on the following day's show.

And then, of course, there are all the Republican miscreants Fox has mistakenly identified as Democrats, like Mark Sanford and Mark Foley, and the insufficiently doctrinaire Republicans it has ID'd as Democrats, like John McCain and Arlen Specter (who did, in fact, become a Democrat later).

One would like to think that all of these were genuine accidents, not intentional efforts to mislead viewers. Hannity's show is advocacy, not news, but even he could surely find more effective and less backfire-prone ways to influence the debate than outright deception.

Even so, this pattern of ideologically-slanted errors illustrates the danger of packaging a news operation around a core of opinion programming. As long as Fox News is a network by and for conservatives, the people who produce its shows -- even its "objective" shows -- are going to see in the news what they expect to see rather than what it really is.

ABC ,CBS , NBC , CNN ........whats the big deal , they all slant crap the way they want it to go , none of them just report the news.

Like who?

Are any of you guys still in the "we shouldn't have done anything" camp? As I recall, there were not alot of alternative suggestions offered up in the past.

Yeah, millions and millions and millions! Because .... where did you get that info from?

But the stimulus package has helped.

Yes, and the actual "real" unemployment rate previously has been 8% when it is reported as 4%, etc. Everyone knows that. The unemployment numbers used always do not count them. But using the same numbers, calculated the same way, as we have always measured unemployment rates, makes sense when comparing, hum?

So share yours - I'd love to see where you got your "millions" number from?