I'm against the Gov't being involved in the internet, and that's because there will always be someone wanting to get the Gov't to take away content they find objectionable. Where were these(Conservative) personal privacy proponents when Bush signed the Conservative-Sponsored internet gambling bill? They believe in limited Gov't? WTF was that? G Damn hypocrites.

There's always Joe Wilson.

:zz: No shortage of blatently, blindly stupid in this recession.

Yes because the dems have never booed a republican prez.

GFY.

1) That had nothing to do with booing - please keep up.

2) You learned a new insult phrase! Good for you! :tro:

It wasn't very classy to do what Wilson did. That being said, I do feel the best argument against the President's speech is that he did not mention any efforts to curtail illegal immigration. Even if he says they aren't going to be insured, they're still going to have to be taken care of in the E.R. of our hospitals. If we all agree that Medical care is expensive, then curtailing illegal immigration has to be a big part of any effort to improve the medical care for Americans. That's just a simple reality that progressives need to stop ignoring. Yes, we all want a better world, but Americans should not have to be punished because people of other cultures see fit to irresponsibly breed beyond their means.