![]() |
Quote:
Your point about drafting makes sense and there are countless times that a horse will sit in 3rd or 4th within a few off the pace and edge outside in the stretch and blow by the tiring front runners. In terms of the Aqueduct inner speed bias I do not believe it was there for the most part. I might be wrong about the lack of an extreme bias but I do know that the horses which ran this winter were the weakest I've seen in years who raced daily at a NY track. |
keeneland is a nice meet. The info is high quality. I guess you could trip it the same you trip any turf meet, and the surface is nice and consistent for that. The big money has been with the surface bias since the changover. You have a surface that favors a different pedigree and running style than dirt does. When they first switched over it was bananas, because the trainers didn't even know what the hell they were doing and every other race seemed like huge trifectas and supers. Now the trainers have somewhat caught on, and that means the value has been cut a little, but you still get horses mis placed and instances where the public is betting against the grain.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
PRUSSIAN |
I thought Candian earning didn't count?
|
Quote:
|
Tomcito's earnings from Peru count so I would assume Prussian's do. . . but he WON'T go to the derby. . .
|
I followed the Keeneland fall meet and enjoyed it. I thought the track played fair and consistent. Keeneland did it right with their track overhaul. NYRA take note.
|
1 through 4 sound great. 5? I wouldn't call it fair. It is kind of the reverse of the Aqueduct inner.
As for drafting, there is little evidence there is anything but a very minimal advantage to it with horses. It isn't cycling. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.