Originally Posted by AeWingnut

so, McCain should try to be conservative ?

like it or not that is the center.

This conservative will NEVER vote for McCain. I would rather have the evil D stalinist than another RINO pretender.

I have a co-worker that hates unions (of which I am a member) and he votes dem. I was like.. "but dems support unions" and he just laughed. Then NAFTA passed and he was tickled to death to see all the factories closing.

Dems forget it was a dem majority in congress and a dem president that sold us out on NAFTA.

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

WOW!! What an f'd up system the Texas Democratic Party has going on.Are you kid'n me? 1/3 of the delegates are given out in the caucus(which looks like a disaster.)The other 2/3 of the delegates are given out by voting in private.Hillary won that by about 100 thousand votes.Now wait,they don't give out delegates by the amount of votes statewide.They give out delegates by the district,and Democratic stronghold areas are given more delegates than the more rural Republican dominated districts.How about we just count up peoples votes.Same as in the National Election in November.Forget the damn state your in.Just add up each Americans vote.Period.For a country that claims be to "fair" and just.We just aren't.If your a Democrat living out in the Texas countryside,evidently your vote in the primary doesn't count as much in the primary as some Democrat from an inner city Dallas district.Then,that same Democrat out in the Texas Countryside really doesn't have any reason to vote in November,because this is a red state.Someday,this crap has to be looked at.Just because you're a voting minority in a state,shouldn't make your vote useless in a presidential election.This is the case for Democrats in Texas,and Republicans in New York etc.

Originally Posted by somerfrost

The status quo only works if McCain is elected...I've a clear choice...a 71 year old white guy who is basically a Bush clone or someone who just might bring about significant change for the better. This election is appearing to be more and more about the economy...and that's a dog that don't hunt for McCain!

Originally Posted by GBBob

Potential Cannon running mate

Originally Posted by GBBob

It is too early in the process to discuss running mates, but I can share with you that she probably won't pass our initial back ground checks. I eagerly await your list of potentials from the deep talent pool that you have to choose from.

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

You obviously dont know much about McCain if you believe that he is a Bush clone and McCains positions on the economy are not much different than Sir Hillary's. I am not commenting on McCain's abilities but he is not that similar to Bush except he is a white guy (which is a bad thing for many lefties)

Originally Posted by Danzig

i don't see how he can be compared to bush, or called a bush clone.

but i also don't see where hillary has all this 'experience' all of a sudden. from where? being first lady of arkansas? first lady of the u.s.? the one thing bill gave her to run with, health care, blew up in her face. her not even two terms as a ny senator? i'd say her time spent in public office is comparable to obamas. and it cracks me up to know that bill said obama is too young, too experienced--sounded almost like what was said about him when he ran!

Originally Posted by GBBob

I'll be announcing my candidacy to run against Cannon shortly as the Dem representative for DT president

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

You obviously dont know much about McCain if you believe that he is a Bush clone and McCains positions on the economy are not much different than Sir Hillary's. I am not commenting on McCain's abilities but he is not that similar to Bush except he is a white guy (which is a bad thing for many lefties)

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

WOW!! What an f'd up system the Texas Democratic Party has going on.Are you kid'n me? 1/3 of the delegates are given out in the caucus(which looks like a disaster.)The other 2/3 of the delegates are given out by voting in private.Hillary won that by about 100 thousand votes.Now wait,they don't give out delegates by the amount of votes statewide.They give out delegates by the district,and Democratic stronghold areas are given more delegates than the more rural Republican dominated districts.How about we just count up peoples votes.Same as in the National Election in November.Forget the damn state your in.Just add up each Americans vote.Period.For a country that claims be to "fair" and just.We just aren't.If your a Democrat living out in the Texas countryside,evidently your vote in the primary doesn't count as much in the primary as some Democrat from an inner city Dallas district.Then,that same Democrat out in the Texas Countryside really doesn't have any reason to vote in November,because this is a red state.Someday,this crap has to be looked at.Just because you're a voting minority in a state,shouldn't make your vote useless in a presidential election.This is the case for Democrats in Texas,and Republicans in New York etc.

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

How can you write so much and say practically nothing? F'N AMAZING

Originally Posted by pgardn

If you dont understand Texas.
I understand why.

Rep. want to run against whom in Nov.?

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

Hill

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

No,it's not the center(if it was,then you wouldn't have this guy as your Republican Presidential Candidate.)Even if you think Republicans voted for him because they were scared of losing with a Conservative.They still were doing that as a result of their views being right of the country's center.The country's center is somewhere between Lieberman and McCain.The more he gets like Lieberman,the more chance he has.Conservatives will vote against Hillary,or Obama(if it's a close state.)McCain should ignore them.Do what he did last week to the Cincy ass-hole.