Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Curlin and Pyro (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=19798)

Coach Pants 01-30-2008 02:20 PM

Uh..

I'm still the best handicapper evar....


right guys?

The Indomitable DrugS 01-30-2008 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
Ok. But DaHoss' comments weren't about wagering success. It was about analyzing talent. I ask again to tell me what my record is that is so bad.

You need only look at your own Signature - and who you rank as the best horse to race in the last 22 years as a start....

Scav 01-30-2008 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
Looking like a genius is wonderful for your ego....but making money is what playing this game is all about. At the end of the day that is what really matters.

Aint this the f'n truth.......

SniperSB23 01-30-2008 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whodey17
They worked in tandem this morning and, according to bloodhorse, only noses apart at the finish line. The 6 furlongs was timed in 1:13 (link below). My question is this, does working with Curlin help Pyro or does it make no difference at all? I could only think that working with a horse like Curlin could only help a 3 year old like Pyro. What are your thoughts (if any)?
http://racing.bloodhorse.com/viewstory.asp?id=43412

Working with Rags to Riches didn't do much for Circular Quay last year.

King Glorious 01-30-2008 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
You need only look at your own Signature - and who you rank as the best horse to race in the last 22 years as a start....

Good point.

pmayjr 01-30-2008 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
Oh, I disagree with all of this in many ways.

Perhaps many here do have similar opinions, but there are some who's understanding of the game stands above the masses, and those are the ones I am more interested in hearing.

I respect pretty much only the opinions of those who bet their money, as if you don't suffer as a result of bad opinions, you will never learn to modify and improve your opinion. For that very reason, most opinions seen here are random and inconsequential, because there is no punishment for being wrong. Maybe you call a losing horse a " pig " but those of us who are playing seriously actually try to determine if we made a mistake, so as not to repeat it in the future, or if circumstance perhaps prevented a decent opinion from coming to fruition. A successful player will make more correct evaluations than an unsuccessful one over time.

Looking like a genius is wonderful for your ego....but making money is what playing this game is all about. At the end of the day that is what really matters.

I thought I made some decent points, but after you dissected them like a wife, girlfriend, a cop, or a cross-examining attorney, and chewed them up, I agree with you. I hope I at least made it clear that I wasn't rooting against Hoss or anyone else that they didn't make those bets. I'm glad they did. I'm rooting for anyone on here to be successful and get paid.

About the part about looking like a genius, I'm saying that people are successful sniffing out winners, longshots, whatever that makes them successful. But in another race they might not even give the winner serious consideration, while someone else was touting the winner all along. You just hope that you're successful in the long-run and learn from your mistakes. So I completely agree with you there.

blackthroatedwind 01-30-2008 02:44 PM

Wow, that was some foursome you compared me to. Ass hole would have sufficed....and been much kinder.

I didn't think you were rooting against DaHoss or anyone.

pmayjr 01-30-2008 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
Wow, that was some foursome you compared me to. Ass hole would have sufficed....and been much kinder.

I didn't think you were rooting against DaHoss or anyone.

I apologize. That was a little harsh. I haven't been to the track since Sunday, and in between I've been spending time with the opposite sex and watching a lot of Law and Order on TNT. They had a friggin marathon on Monday. So I've been a little negatively influenced.

Coach Pants 01-30-2008 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pmayjr
I apologize. That was a little harsh. I haven't been to the track since Sunday, and in between I've been spending time with the opposite sex and watching a lot of Law and Order on TNT. They had a friggin marathon on Monday. So I've been a little negatively influenced.

Hmmm.

blackthroatedwind 01-30-2008 02:49 PM

It was really the lawyer comparison that did it for me.

pmayjr 01-30-2008 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pillow Pants
Hmmm.

Please refrain from bringing up Dale Baird.

King Glorious 01-30-2008 02:53 PM

For the record, I wasn't even saying DaHoss has a bad record. I don't know his record at all. We all pick some good ones and we all pick some bad ones. Constructing a winning ticket though is far different, IMO, than analyzing talent. There have been plenty of times where I have not liked a horse to win a race but have played him on my ticket because I didn't want that logical horse to be the one that kept me from cashing. I would collect on the winning bet even though I had totally analyzed the race wrong. That just made me a better bettor, not a better analyzer of talent.

Coach Pants 01-30-2008 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pmayjr
Please refrain from bringing up Dale Baird.

In a thread about Steve Asmussen's runners and dick measuring? Absolutely not.

hoovesupsideyourhead 01-30-2008 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
For the record, I wasn't even saying DaHoss has a bad record. I don't know his record at all. We all pick some good ones and we all pick some bad ones. Constructing a winning ticket though is far different, IMO, than analyzing talent. There have been plenty of times where I have not liked a horse to win a race but have played him on my ticket because I didn't want that logical horse to be the one that kept me from cashing. I would collect on the winning bet even though I had totally analyzed the race wrong. That just made me a better bettor, not a better analyzer of talent.

huh........you siad ..mine king.. is no worse than hosses

pmayjr 01-30-2008 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pillow Pants
In a thread about Steve Asmussen's runners and dick measuring? Absolutely not.

LOL! I swear I wasn't trying to instigate in any of these replies, but the replies I've gotten to my posts are ****en classic. It's becoming very tempting to say some crazy-ass'd Skip Bayless **** just to evoke reaction... Actually, I swear to never be as retarded as that guy (leaving myself open for Bayless comparisioons... plkease once again refrain lol).

cmorioles 01-30-2008 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pmayjr
I apologize. That was a little harsh. I haven't been to the track since Sunday, and in between I've been spending time with the opposite sex and watching a lot of Law and Order on TNT. They had a friggin marathon on Monday. So I've been a little negatively influenced.

I hope they were the episodes when Ben Stone was still around.

The Indomitable DrugS 01-30-2008 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
For the record, I wasn't even saying DaHoss has a bad record.

No, but you started this thread into a downword spiral by calling Pyro "a rat."

While Pyro is FAR from a true superstar - he is the current future book favorite for the Kentucky Derby - and every race of his career so far has been fairly solid.

DaHoss simply called you on your silly attention grabbing comment.

King Glorious 01-30-2008 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead
huh........you siad ..mine king.. is no worse than hosses

And also no better. Here is what I said:

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
My record? Tell me what this record is and then tell me how it compares to your record? I'd bet that we are pretty much close to the same when it comes to analyzing talent. I'd bet that pretty much everyone on here is close to the same.

I said that pretty much everyone on here is close to the same. Nowhere did I put him down or offend him. There's no need for that. I don't know his record at all nor do I remember anyone's record but I know that over time, things pretty much even out and we all fall pretty much in the same area.

pmayjr 01-30-2008 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmorioles
I hope they were the episodes when Ben Stone was still around.


That's the guy before Jack McCoy right? He wasn't bad...

blackthroatedwind 01-30-2008 03:03 PM

I may not agree with King Glorious's opinions but he's a far cry for a cheap shot artist. He's nuts....but he's very kind and thoughtful.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.