Quote:
Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
Come on Scavs, how would you feel if you bet that horse? Guy even admitted he phucked up. I guess it's cool he admitted it, but it doesn't excuse it. I can at least kind of excuse Trujillo for not ever riding there, although he should have been more prepared. Trust me, this isn't an isolated incident with this guy. Your analogy is completely wrong. Kent cost this horse the win, no one else did.
|
Dude, I would be pissed if I bet the horse, I won't deny that but dude, **** happens is what I am trying to say.
Quote:
Originally Posted by saucon17
You don't see Laviolette misjudging finish lines.
|
Do I even have to respond to such an easy response. This is because he always is running 5th, he hasn't seen the Arlington finish line in like three years in an allowance race.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigsmc
You are correct. In Hooves selection thread right after the race, I called it a monkey see-monkey do move by KD. Doesn't excuse it though.
Scavs is just trying to wind us up. He would've been going ballistic if he had done one of his classic load ups on this horse.
|
I would have but again, 9 times out of 10 I get a good ride out of this guy, a perfect example was this past Sunday on McPeek's Glitterman horse, this horse wanted to go touch the toteboard a couple times and almost tossed Kent three times, but that didn't happen because he is Kent Desormeaux, Scav's go to jockey when needs to get out
I tend not to get pissed at rides that much unless it is when they go a bizillion wide and have no shot. Which is why I never bet Albarado, or at least try not to.
FYI, another tidbit I will hide in this thread, the Laviolette off theory will be in full affect at Arlington in the opening weeks, allocate tons of money towards these and you will have 5 tons of money afterward the first month. :)
|