![]() |
Looks like this'll be the first BC that I skip in terms of gambling. Can't stand SoCal racing, can't stand synthetic racing.
|
Quote:
|
You Know what's good about this? NOTHING!! Oh...By the way...On what surface did Notional just bust his ankle up on? POLY-TRACK
Poly-Track= One more example of the pussification of America. |
Quote:
|
Oh this is wonderful!!
With the joint decisions to add a BC mile race, and run the BC on poly, a spectacular superstar like Joe Got Even will finally be able to win that Breeders' Cup race he so richly deserves next year. I can't wait. I guess some people saw the Bluegrass last week and thought.....YES!! I want the BC Classic to look like that! Ridiculous. |
Our voice can only be heard by the handle, specifically the decline of.. as long as people continue to bet on it, those in charge will see no problem with it..
look at the numbers at Keeneland. It's amazing. The only thing we're lacking in this years Derby is some polytrack.. because it is just not confusing enough as it is :rolleyes: I applaud those who hate it and are backing it up by not gambling. Boy, if the handle went down for BC '08 significantly, what's the first thing they're going to point to? As for me, I'm a degenerate and will gamble on anything. |
Hugely dissapointing....imo.
|
The world finally accepted the horseless carriage, the flying machine, the telegraph, radio, TV, the internet and even instant coffee. I imagine Polytrack will be accepted eventually also.
Incidentally, man has walked on the moon, Elvis really is dead, and Bill Buckner still has not caught that ground ball. All realities of life--along with Polytrack. |
Quote:
|
They have yet to install the surface in Arcadia let alone run a race and most in this thread begin whining now?
Artificial surfaces are now part of the game. You don't or won't play Del Mar, Keeneland, Arlington, Santa Anita, Woodbine, Turfway, Hollywood, Golden Gate and more? Start boning up on the dogs. Thoroughbreds aren't for you anymore. |
First off, no one knows that S.A. is putting in Polytrack , they could put in Cushion track which can be as fast as dirt and still kind to the horses since we are all worried about the frikin horses not going fast enough .
S.A is a beautiful location , last time it was held there the place was so packed you couldnt move , as for the mile races being a bitch , you wont have to worry about that wicked ledge on the outside when they put in a synthetic track because the whole surface will be level , so no more fretting about horses going down the slope. I for one like the one and only synthetic surface that I have been on , it is kind yet not biased , your speed horse can still work in 58 and change and your distance horse will still go his normal speed all with the added bonus of horses not breaking their freaking legs off. I just dont get people , they say the breed is fragile and watered down by speed , so now when horses have to go slower in order to finish ( which means people will have to breed more for stamina) everybody gets their pantys all bunched up. I just know from what I have seen so far that Cushion track works , horses are staying sounder and to me that is what counts, not that they go 21 , 44, 56, and so on , as the saying goes , SPEED KILLS. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
do we really need to start debating here???:eek: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
damn tease...:( |
Quote:
|
Hate California all you want, but I will be at the 2008 Breeders Cup for 2 days in wonderful Califorinia Sunshine while most of you will be locked up for the winter. Warm sunshine or freezing ass snow. No brainer for most.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:13 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.