Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Are these Trainers bad for the game? (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=10315)

Coach Pants 02-27-2007 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterB
so if Chuck went there, he is a druggy?

or sells eggs?

Chuck was talking about Portland Meadows. Charles Town is a couple notches above that dump.

mark2061mn 02-27-2007 06:16 PM

i like how he fabulous strike was 40/1 in his debut and ran about like a 40/1 shot should.

he switches trainers and goes off at 3/2 in PA, and romps.

then again, i am fairly new to watching east coast racing, and maybe tampa is a much better track than anything in PA. doesnt seem likely, but who knows.

The Indomitable DrugS 02-27-2007 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bid
Look at some of the out of form crows the beattie clan turn around. It takes more than Great horsemanship to win with some of the plugs they gallop with.

I totally agree.

They constantly move horses up dramatically.

It's hard to say how someone like a Mullins or Dutrow would do with the horses they get---but I'd be absolutley shocked if they'd do better, and I'm not even convinced they'd do as good.

cmorioles 02-28-2007 05:24 AM

DrugS,

Thanks for keeping the other two names under wraps!

As for the Beattie horses, they may appear overbet on paper, but they are obviously underbet. I keep sending it in on them, don't even look at the form.

Dunbar 02-28-2007 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS

As you can clearly see, the last 949 horses to run for this lady have produced a truly MIND-BOGGLING 21% profit on the betting dollar. When you consider the sample size and the profit...it's beyond remarkable..it's almost impossible.



And it's not like a few 70/1 shots made the ROI stats misleading. She shows a flat bet profit in all three ranges of odds. With short priced horses, with mid-priced horses, and with longshots.

Great post, DrugS.

I would point out, though, that even though she shows a flat bet profit across the board, she is basically breaking even on the horses 4-1 or less. The 21% ROI is largely due to her success in bringing home the medium- and longshots. Making 4% ROI on the favs is fairly outstanding in its own right, considering there were over 500 starts in that group. I can only be wistful about adding in the 4-7% Pinnacle rebate to that ROI.

I thought the "under 11 days" fig was pretty amazing, too. Interesting that she does much better with the quick return or the longish layoff than with more "normal" spacing. That may be a function of the bettors giving those factors too much weight, at least where her horses are concerned.

Thanks for posting the data.

--Dunbar

saucon17 02-28-2007 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
Also maybe you or someone else knows, but I noticed that when Scott Lake is suspended some of his horses run under Ryan Beattie's name. Relation??

Ryan "Buck" Beattie is Todd's nephew. He was Todd's assistant at Penn
National until he went on his own a couple years ago. Todd has always been high percentage trainer and I do think he is honest because he has a lot of better quality horses. Most of Todd's horses are bought at sales or homebreds by their owners. Steph Beattie also runs horses also under her assistant name Donald Wells at CT and Penn. My friend has horses with Steph at Penn the horses show vast improvement when in her training routine. He said they do a lot of treadmill work and long gallops.

You should the miracle Steph did on a horse named Holiday Peak that
ran at Philly Park in the 2nd race on Feb 13, 2007 and this HORSE WAS
12/1 MORNING LINE. This was off the claim

http://www.brisnet.com/cgi-bin/insta...7-02-13&race=2

I forgot to tell you check out the double payoff. They didn't bet the double with a
3-1 winner in the first

MISTERGEE 02-28-2007 10:46 AM

pinnacle
 
i thought pinnacle stopped taking plays from the U.S.

The Indomitable DrugS 02-28-2007 12:35 PM

Here is a side-by-side comparison with Steph Beattie and Todd Pletcher, comparing their win% and ROI in the three diffrent odds ranges.

4/1 OR LESS:

Beattie: 35% wins. $2.08 ROI
Pletcher: 32% wins. $1.73 ROI

BETWEEN 9/2 up to 10/1

Beattie: 17% wins. $2.37 ROI
Pletcher: 13% wins. $1.81 ROI

GREATER THAN 10/1

Beattie: 10% wins. $3.88 ROI
Pletcher: 5% wins. $1.58 ROI

Beattie wins all the win percentage categories between 3-to-5%. She also sweeps the ROI categories by 35 points, 56 points, and 230 points.

You'd see similar mis-matches with all the other big name move-up guys.

I just think it's pretty damn perverted, when you have to make the trainer the #1 factor in your handicapping--as you'd certainly have to do in certain low-profile ares of the country. That's not what handicapping horses should ever be about.

Sightseek 02-28-2007 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
Here is a side-by-side comparison with Steph Beattie and Todd Pletcher, comparing their win% and ROI in the three diffrent odds ranges.

4/1 OR LESS:

Beattie: 35% wins. $2.08 ROI
Pletcher: 32% wins. $1.73 ROI

BETWEEN 9/2 up to 10/1

Beattie: 17% wins. $2.37 ROI
Pletcher: 13% wins. $1.81 ROI

GREATER THAN 10/1

Beattie: 10% wins. $3.88 ROI
Pletcher: 5% wins. $1.58 ROI

Beattie wins all the win percentage categories between 3-to-5%. She also sweeps the ROI categories by 35 points, 56 points, and 230 points.

You'd see similar mis-matches with all the other big name move-up guys.

I just think it's pretty damn perverted, when you have to make the trainer the #1 factor in your handicapping--as you'd certainly have to do in certain low-profile ares of the country. That's not what handicapping horses should ever be about.

Apparently they handed out the Eclipse to the wrong trainer.

plahotnyu 02-28-2007 12:53 PM

No amount of treadmill work, or long gallops, produces these kinds of percentages. I can't believe it to be possible.

saucon17 02-28-2007 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grits
No amount of treadmill work, or long gallops, produces these kinds of percentages. I can't believe it to be possible.

I sort agree with you. I think she does best by claiming horses
off very bad trainers and putting them on their program. They
also train at a farm not far from Penn. The horse Holiday Peak
was claimed off a very low percentage trainer. You usually don't
see vast improvement when she takes a horse from a high percentage
trainer

slotdirt 02-28-2007 01:44 PM

I've heard nothing but good things about Todd Beattie; I don't know a thing about the Stephanie girl.

saucon17 02-28-2007 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slotdirt
I've heard nothing but good things about Todd Beattie; I don't know a thing about the Stephanie girl.

Totally agree with you. I don't think people realize
how good of a horsemen he is. I seen his horses live
at the Pa. tracks and Delaware and they are a picture
health.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.