Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   Breeders' Cup Archive (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=22)
-   -   2009 Breeders' Cup (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=32101)

Gander 11-01-2009 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
How does facing bad fields make a good horse any less of a good horse? I don't understand that logic. I don't think she has to improve significantly at all, I don't think she is at the mercy of the pace at all, and I don't think any of the other closers are better closers than her.

She is amzaingly consistent and talented but it just seems logical to me that if she is all out to beat horses like Life is Sweet and Briecat, she may have a tough time getting up against very accomplished horses like this field has, and I am pretty confident she needs pace help. She may not need it against Briecat but she'll need it here. I just dont see this materializng. We'll see....done talking about this until we see the official entries because I am skeptical we even we'll get the chance to find out.

NTamm1215 11-01-2009 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
How can the horse possibly be an outsider when it has run clearly the best race of anyone in the field?

On top of having clearly the best race ... it might be as high as 5th or 6th choice in the betting.

If you argued that the horse was an underlay for underneath in exotic spots .. than I would certainly agree because of her running style and the factors you mention.

These types often either win easily as non-favorites ... or bomb. They have an absolutely spectacular ROI on the win end ... but they also completely bomb quite a bit.

I wasn't saying that Connie and Michael is an outsider. I was saying that if you were asking a horse who's an outsider to step up and run big in a race like this off of one MSW race then the value would probably be there. Basically I was saying that there will be no value on Connie and Michael anywhere, at least to me, because the likelihood of her duplicating that effort is low. I think she's more likely to bomb.

NT

King Glorious 11-01-2009 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gander
She is amzaingly consistent and talented but it just seems logical to me that if she is all out to beat horses like Life is Sweet and Briecat, she may have a tough time getting up against very accomplished horses like this field has, and I am pretty confident she needs pace help. She may not need it against Briecat but she'll need it here. I just dont see this materializng. We'll see....done talking about this until we see the official entries because I am skeptical we even we'll get the chance to find out.

Guess it kinda depends on if you feel she was all out to beat those horses. I don't think she was. And even if she was a couple of starts back, she sure didn't look like it in her last.

Gander 11-01-2009 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
Guess it kinda depends on if you feel she was all out to beat those horses. I don't think she was. And even if she was a couple of starts back, she sure didn't look like it in her last.

Her last, I agree, from a visual standpoint, was an impressive paid public workout. It may have been the best race I have seen from her. I just take into account competition as a major factor and even you agree, this is by far her toughest test (thats a huge understatement).

And I do like Awesome Gem, but the way this race is shaping up, I dont think he's the kind of horse who can win without significant help up front. I doubt I will even use him.

The Indomitable DrugS 11-01-2009 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NTamm1215
I was saying that if you were asking a horse who's an outsider to step up and run big in a race like this off of one MSW race then the value would probably be there.

Yeah, the value would be there if you mean big odds ... but so would a less than sensational race ... and such a horse would have no shot at big odds.


Quote:

Originally Posted by NTamm1215
Basically I was saying that there will be no value on Connie and Michael anywhere, at least to me, because the likelihood of her duplicating that effort is low. I think she's more likely to bomb.

She is more likely than not to bomb .... but she is also more likely to win than her projected closing odds will indicate.

I have her as a possible big overlay to win and a possible huge underlay to finish underneath in exotics.

The opposite of how a horse like a Perfect Drift or Dynever was often a big underlay to win and an overlay to finish underneath.

Anyone that uses her in the 3rd or 4th slot in exotics is a fool. Anyone that denies her extreme once-a-year like debut talent is also being extremely foolish.

philcski 11-01-2009 06:49 PM

How many horses have won the BCJ or BCJF off just a debut race?

NTamm1215 11-01-2009 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski
How many horses have won the BCJ or BCJF off just a debut race?

I believe none. Action This Day and Indian Blessing both had only two starts and that's the fewest any winners have had.

NT

Indian Charlie 11-01-2009 06:55 PM

I think UBS and Brocco both had two starts as well.

NTamm1215 11-01-2009 06:57 PM

Interestingly and somewhat obviously enough, the last three Juv Fillies winners at SA won the Oak Leaf.

I have basically no opinion on this year's Juv Fillies as it is by far the race on Friday I'm looking forward to the least. Except that I think Connie and Michael won't win.

NT

Sightseek 11-01-2009 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NTamm1215
Interestingly and somewhat obviously enough, the last three Juv Fillies winners at SA won the Oak Leaf.

I have basically no opinion on this year's Juv Fillies as it is by far the race on Friday I'm looking forward to the least. Except that I think Connie and Michael won't win.

NT

I thought Blind Luck's last two races were strong...

RockHardTen1985 11-01-2009 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NTamm1215
I believe none. Action This Day and Indian Blessing both had only two starts and that's the fewest any winners have had.

NT


One of Indian Blessings was a Grade 1.

The Indomitable DrugS 11-01-2009 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski
How many horses have won the BCJ or BCJF off just a debut race?

How many have ever been entered?

Very, very, very few ... and none of them even had so much as a slim chance.

You can find a lot of 4th and 5th choices who simply have no chance. Very rarely do you find a 4th or 5th choice who only needs to run back to her last race to win.

Few trainers suck as much as Ken McPeak does with debuting sprinters. Few trainers have ever been as strong as Ken McPeak is with 2nd time starters going long.

King Glorious 11-01-2009 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985
One of Indian Blessings was a Grade 1.

Right.

Betsy 11-01-2009 07:57 PM

http://www.drf.com/news/article/108617.html

King Glorious, given the work, would you send Girolamo to the Cigar Mile? It doesn't sound like he's that happy with the surface.....he usually works much better than this. Is it possible perhaps Godolphin wanted to put a stiff work into him because he's inexperienced?

NTamm1215 11-01-2009 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Betsy
http://www.drf.com/news/article/108617.html

King Glorious, given the work, would you send Girolamo to the Cigar Mile? It doesn't sound like he's that happy with the surface.....he usually works much better than this. Is it possible perhaps Godolphin wanted to put a stiff work into him because he's inexperienced?

What is with your fixation with him?

NT

Betsy 11-01-2009 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NTamm1215
What is with your fixation with him?

NT

I assume you mean Girolamao and not King Glorious? The colt is one of my favorite horses and he's got a lot of questions surrounding him. I respect the opinions of posters on the board and so I ask ?. I hope that's not a problem? I have a few other favorite horses, but I don't need to ask ? about them because they are fairly solid.

philcski 11-01-2009 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
How many have ever been entered?

Very, very, very few ... and none of them even had so much as a slim chance.

You can find a lot of 4th and 5th choices who simply have no chance. Very rarely do you find a 4th or 5th choice who only needs to run back to her last race to win.

Few trainers suck as much as Ken McPeak does with debuting sprinters. Few trainers have ever been as strong as Ken McPeak is with 2nd time starters going long.

It was a question for debate, given the horse discussed.

Very few that I can remember have been entered, usually because they wouldn't draw in anyways because the gate would fill with horses who had graded stakes points. Now so few 2yo's have more than 3-4 starts before the BC it certainly allows a maiden winner to not only get in but have a reasonable shot.

As for her odds, I think she might be higher than 4th or 5th choice. Always a Princess, Beautician, Bickersons, Blind Luck, Devil May Care, Negligee, and She Be Wild will probably be lower odds than her (whether warranted or not.) I think if you like her, you will get 15-1 or 20-1. My guesses...
Blind Luck 7/2
Negligee 9/2
She Be Wild 6/1
Devil May Care 10/1
Always a Princess 12/1
Beautician 15/1
Bickersons 15/1
Connie and Michael 15/1
Biofuel 25/1
Zilva 30/1
Ms Vanenzza 30/1
Champagne D'Oro 100/1

Sightseek 11-01-2009 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski
It was a question for debate, given the horse discussed.

Very few that I can remember have been entered, usually because they wouldn't draw in anyways because the gate would fill with horses who had graded stakes points. Now so few 2yo's have more than 3-4 starts before the BC it certainly allows a maiden winner to not only get in but have a reasonable shot.

As for her odds, I think she might be higher than 4th or 5th choice. Always a Princess, Beautician, Bickersons, Blind Luck, Devil May Care, Negligee, and She Be Wild will probably be lower odds than her (whether warranted or not.) I think if you like her, you will get 15-1 or 20-1. My guesses...
Blind Luck 7/2
Negligee 9/2
She Be Wild 6/1
Devil May Care 10/1
Always a Princess 12/1
Beautician 15/1
Bickersons 15/1
Connie and Michael 15/1
Biofuel 25/1
Zilva 30/1
Ms Vanenzza 30/1
Champagne D'Oro 100/1

You really think Beautician will be that high with the obvious trouble in last race and prior efforts?

philcski 11-01-2009 09:19 PM

Also, in reference to your McPeek stretchout comments, it looks like he's trying to enter my friend's horse off just a debut maiden win in the BCJ (or BCJT) since he scratched out of the Iroquois today.

While I'll root for him he doesn't have much of a chance and quite frankly I don't know if he'll even draw in, as he's last on the AE's list.

Danzig 11-01-2009 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NTamm1215
What is with your fixation with him?

NT


ap indy. betsy is a fan of his and follows his extended family.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.