Derby Trail Forums - Wisconsin Recall

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)

- The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=4)

- - Wisconsin Recall (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=47032)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 867278)

They are the attachments to the court documents you are ignoring the existence of.

Let's go back:

Riot says that it turns out Scott Walker lied. He did not ask for the criminal investigation, Walker stonewalled it.
Wiphan says, "Give me proof" that Scott Walker lied, and did not ask for the criminal investigation, but stonewalled it.
Riot provides the proof - in the form of the newspaper article outlining it, with the attachment of the original court complaint proving it.

Wiphan and Clip Clop pretend it doesn't exist.

Wiphan says, "Walker called for the John Doe investigation. That is a fact". No, Wiphan. Scott Walker lied about that, and the proof is right in front of your eyes.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...f+&hl=en&gl=us

Copy and paste from this document an email please.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop (Post 867281)

http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...f+&hl=en&gl=us

Copy and paste from this document an email please.

She can't. It doesn't exist.

I asked for 1 single email from Scott Walker's office. She can not produce it. GAME SET MATCH.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop (Post 867281)

http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...f+&hl=en&gl=us

Copy and paste from this document an email please.

The document isn't in a form that can be copy and pasted. So I assume you didn't even bother to open the link.

Once again, for the slow:

Riot says that it turns out Scott Walker lied. He did not ask for the criminal investigation, Walker stonewalled it.

Wiphan says, "Give me proof".

Riot provides the proof - in the form of the newspaper article outlining Walker's lies, with the attachment of the original court complaint proving it.

Wiphan and Clip Clop pretend it doesn't exist.

Wiphan says, "Walker called for the John Doe investigation. That is a fact".

No, Wiphan. Scott Walker lied about that, and the proof came out last Friday, and is right in front of your eyes in the link I provided.

Scott Walker lied to the public and the citizens of Wisconsin about asking for the John Doe investigation. He did not. He stonewalled it.

Scott Walker lied to Wisconsin about his criminal defense fund not being for himself. It is.

Scott Walker lied to Wisconsin about himself not being the subject of the investigation. He is. Walker is John Doe.

Quote:

Document suggests Walker stalled inquiry
By Daniel Bice of the Journal Sentinel
May 31, 2012

Milwaukee County prosecutors opened the secret John Doe criminal investigation more than two years ago after being stonewalled by Gov. Scott Walker's office when he was county executive, according to a newly released record.

Documents attached

GAME. SET. MATCH.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 867288)

The document isn't in a form that can be copy and pasted. So I assume you didn't even bother to open the link.

Once again, for the slow:

Riot says that it turns out Scott Walker lied. He did not ask for the criminal investigation, Walker stonewalled it.

Wiphan says, "Give me proof".

Riot provides the proof - in the form of the newspaper article outlining Walker's lies, with the attachment of the original court complaint proving it.

Wiphan and Clip Clop pretend it doesn't exist.

Wiphan says, "Walker called for the John Doe investigation. That is a fact".

No, Wiphan. Scott Walker lied about that, and the proof came out last Friday, and is right in front of your eyes in the link I provided.

Scott Walker lied to the public and the citizens of Wisconsin about asking for the John Doe investigation. He did not. He stonewalled it.

Scott Walker lied to Wisconsin about his criminal defense fund not being for himself. It is.

Scott Walker lied to Wisconsin about himself not being the subject of the investigation. He is. Walker is John Doe.

This is the html version of the file http://wispolitics.com/1006/large/12..._Kavanaugh.pdf.
Google automatically generates html versions of documents as we crawl the web

Top line, guess you never opened it, huh?

THE ABOVE NAMED COMPLAINING WITNESS BEENG DULY SWORN, ON ENFORMATION
AND BELIEF STATES THAT:
COUNT 1: THEFT (EMBEZZLEMENT) (VALUE EXCEEDING $10,000)
The above-named defendant between 2006 and 2009, at 3949 East Mallory Ave., in the City of
Cudahy, and other locations within Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, as trustee, having
possession of money of the Military Order of Purple Heart, Inc., Michelle Witmer Chapter 96,
having a value exceeding $10,000, did use such money without the owner's consent, contrary to
the defendant's authority, and with intent to convert said property to his own use or to the use of
any other person except the owner, contrary to sec. 943.20(1)(b) and (3)(c), 971 336(3)

Copied and pasted.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop (Post 867292)

Then you are far smarter than me, as I still cannot copy and paste from the document.

Once again:

Riot said that it turns out Scott Walker lied. He did not ask for the criminal investigation, Walker stonewalled it.

Wiphan says, "Give me proof".

Riot provides the proof - in the form of the newspaper article outlining Walker's lies, with the attachment of the original court complaint proving it.

So: now it's up to you and Wiphan: What part of the Journal-Sentinel article saying Scott Walker lied, and the court documents supporting it, do you think are not true? What part is the Journal-Sentinal lying about? And please provide the proof.

Why was the news about Scott Walker lying ignored during the election?

Because Walker supporters didn't want to accept the fact their governor lied to their faces.

Quote:

The Elephant in Scott Walker's Courtroom: A John Doe Investigation, a Rise to Power, and a Crazy Case

Read more: http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politic...#ixzz1xF7KHX1B

..... continued ...

.... The John Doe investigation has been the elephant in the room of the recall election ever since it was launched. Democratic candidate Tom Barrett has been hammering at it over the past two weeks, and he appears to be getting some people to notice the possibility that Walker could win the recall and end up indicted anyway. The most significant turn of events came last week, on May 31, just as Walker and Barrett were preparing to debate that night, when Daniel Bice, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reporter who's been an absolute bulldog on this investigation, published a damaging piece in which Bice said that, contrary to Walker's repeated insistence that he had called for the John Doe investigation himself, the investigators on the case opened the investigation themselves after two years of stonewalling by Walker and his administration. Bice's story was based on a document filed with the court in the Russell case.

The conference in chambers lasted a little more than an hour. Once court resumed, Judge Hansher ruled that the trial itself would not begin until September, which, he said, would give the publicity surrounding the recall election a chance to die down, and ensure that Russell got a fair and impartial jury. Then, Hansher began talking about the document that had somehow gotten into the hands of Daniel Bice. "In chambers," the judge said, "Mr. Krueger admitted that he had given the material to Mr. Bice and that he had done so with his client's consent. Is that true?"

"Yes," said Dennis Krueger.

That got heads snapping to attention. Tim Russell's lawyer — and, therefore, Tim Russell — had made public damaging information about Scott Walker and undermined the whole ethical basis of the governor's response to charges that he had misused his public office for private gain. It is not unreasonable to assume that this either was a warning shot — take care of me or you're going down, too — or evidence that Russell already has rolled.

.... continued

Quote:

Document suggests Walker stalled inquiry
http://www.jsonline.com/watchdog/noq...156065645.html

Quote:

Originally Posted by witchdoctor (Post 867882)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VC_ult6-Tb4

that was hilarious. well done by whoever put that together (whether you believe it all or not!).

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 867887)

that was hilarious. well done by whoever put that together (whether you believe it all or not!).

Funny stuff, there were several of those Hitler rants made, all different subjects...On one he finds out Obama is not a U.S citizen..lol..
There are several at this link..also finds out he's Jewish and black..:D

http://www.youtube.com/results?searc....0.SzVcNM0ZI7A

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop (Post 866839)

As an owner of two companies and an employer of a great many folks, I am entitled to as many slow days as I can get. See I am non-union and therefore have to often work more than 40 hours a week!! Sometimes even on weekends.

maybe if you had enough staff, you wouldn't have to work weekends. Maybe if your workers had a union, they would be more productive and you could be playin hosses on the weekends

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alabama Stakes (Post 872010)

maybe if you had enough staff, you wouldn't have to work weekends. Maybe if your workers had a union, they would be more productive and you could be playin hosses on the weekends

I laughed