Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   10:30pm Sunday Night President's Having a Press Conference? (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=42092)

somerfrost 05-04-2011 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 773612)
Riot told me I had the penis of a 9 year old. Far worse IMO ;)

and though banning her would make this place more sane it wouldn't be nearly as fun. The ignore option is there for a reason I guess.

A thread about us finally getting OBL, which should be a cause for unity is hijacked by folks taking personal shots at one another...seriously, Nascar is in fact an internet bully but that's hardly news, the unfortunate thing is he's leading folks down an unfortunate path. Responding merely feeds his ego at the expense of meaningful discussion.

Dahoss 05-04-2011 12:34 PM

Chastising people while standing on a permanent soapbox helps move along discussions well also. :rolleyes:

somerfrost 05-04-2011 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dahoss (Post 773643)
Chastising people while standing on a permanent soapbox helps move along discussions well also. :rolleyes:

Making an obvious point is a long way from chastising anyone, and the soapbox thing has become rather stale don't you think?

Antitrust32 05-04-2011 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jms62 (Post 773609)
So you are saying Nascar didn't disrespect Riot and you are good with him calling her the C word and I am out of line for calling him out on it? Just need to be clear on this before I respond to your post becuase that is how I take your post.

dude Riot accused him of being a wife beater. I would have said a lot worse than the "C" word.

She's going to come back and say she didnt call him a wife beater.. just said he has the same characteristics of a wife beater. (which is kind of true of what she did say.. but i still wouldnt have taken it lightly)

Antitrust32 05-04-2011 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by somerfrost (Post 773637)
A thread about us finally getting OBL, which should be a cause for unity is hijacked by folks taking personal shots at one another...seriously, Nascar is in fact an internet bully but that's hardly news, the unfortunate thing is he's leading folks down an unfortunate path. Responding merely feeds his ego at the expense of meaningful discussion.

Nascar is certainly not the best internet poster in the world. But if someone had accused me of being abusing my wife I wouldnt be happy about it either.

Antitrust32 05-04-2011 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32 (Post 773679)
dude Riot accused him of being a wife beater. I would have said a lot worse than the "C" word.

She's going to come back and say she didnt call him a wife beater.. just said he has the same characteristics of a wife beater.

I just figured out my post made it sound like Riot called Nascar a mens t-shirt.

Antitrust32 05-04-2011 02:41 PM

just so I dont get accused of making things up here is the old Riot post:


"You're kind of a textbook case of the domineering misogynistic jackass, who sometimes degenerates into wife-beating.

Ordering another person what to feel, attempted control of anothers emotions (setting them up for failure if they dare disagree with you)

Attempted disparagement, but passive-aggressive, justification of their aggressive actions by saying another agrees with them

Threat of future harm

Yup. You're the textbook misogynistic jackass. Good luck with that, buddy. "


so while I dont really care for Nascars continued posts of "I dont care what you think of me, clean your toilet, iggy list" I understand his frustration towards Riot.

but seriously, nobody even lets him write a post without jumping down his throat. just ignore it instead of throwing fuel on the fire.

somerfrost 05-04-2011 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32 (Post 773679)
dude Riot accused him of being a wife beater. I would have said a lot worse than the "C" word.

She's going to come back and say she didnt call him a wife beater.. just said he has the same characteristics of a wife beater.

I'm not aware of what Riot posted about Nascar, but saying one has the characteristics of something is NOT the same as saying one is in fact that something. Inflamatory perhaps but not the same. In any event, Riot is capable of addressing this herself but folks here sometimes seem unable to differentiate subtle differences. OK, just read the repost...again, my point remains, she uses the word "sometimes", not the same as "always" or "does".

Antitrust32 05-04-2011 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by somerfrost (Post 773685)
I'm not aware of what Riot posted about Nascar, but saying one has the characteristics of something is NOT the same as saying one is in fact that something. Inflamatory perhaps but not the same. In any event, Riot is capable of addressing this herself but folks here sometimes seem unable to differentiate subtle differences. OK, just read the repost...again, my point remains, she uses the word "sometimes", not the same as "always" or "does".

even with the word sometimes... it would have infuriated me if I was the one accused.

I understand Nascar's anger about it. Plus the guy cant even make one post with out being jumped on. I think its excessive even if the guy does make dumb comments.

She just thinks I'm a dumb bitch.. so thats fine. I think the world of Riot.

somerfrost 05-04-2011 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32 (Post 773691)
even with the word sometimes... it would have infuriated me if I was the one accused.

I understand Nascar's anger about it. Plus the guy cant even make one post with out being jumped on. I think its excessive even if the guy does make dumb comments.

She just thinks I'm a dumb bitch.. so thats fine. I think the world of Riot.

I'm beating a dead horse here but...she didn't "accuse" she implied at worse. Maybe not the best response, but when one is drawn into battle, one will respond in kind, to take her post in context you really have to look at events leading up to same. Now I'm doing what I said others have done, being distracted from the subject of the thread, so I will leave it at that.

Mike 05-04-2011 03:21 PM

I bet Osama never once called any of his 25 wives the C word:(

somerfrost 05-04-2011 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike (Post 773706)
I bet Osama never once called any of his 25 wives the C word:(

So, are you saying Nascar should expect a visit from Navy Seals?

Antitrust32 05-04-2011 03:25 PM

So now that Obama isnt going to release pictures of Osama... what will Indian Charlie do now?

WWICD?

somerfrost 05-04-2011 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32 (Post 773713)
So now that Obama isnt going to release pictures of Osama... what will Indian Charlie do now?

WWICD?

Regardless of what the conspiracy theorists say it is exactly the right decision, there is nothing to be gained from releasing morbid photos and the reaction could be harmful to innocent folks.

MaTH716 05-04-2011 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by somerfrost (Post 773715)
Regardless of what the conspiracy theorists say it is exactly the right decision, there is nothing to be gained from releasing morbid photos and the reaction could be harmful to innocent folks.

While I agree that there is nothing to gain by them releasing the photo, the harmful reaction is still a realistic scenario regardless of the photo, burial and so on.

For the record though, I would have liked to see it.

Dahoss 05-04-2011 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by somerfrost (Post 773647)
Making an obvious point is a long way from chastising anyone, and the soapbox thing has become rather stale don't you think?

Yeah, the soapbox thing is stale, so stop already.

Everyone gets it. You're awesome. YAY!!!!

Dahoss 05-04-2011 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32 (Post 773684)
but seriously, nobody even lets him write a post without jumping down his throat. just ignore it instead of throwing fuel on the fire.

:rolleyes:

somerfrost 05-04-2011 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dahoss (Post 773721)
Yeah, the soapbox thing is stale, so stop already.

Everyone gets it. You're awesome. YAY!!!!

I get it, you feel compelled to disparage anyone you disagree with,

Antitrust32 05-04-2011 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaTH716 (Post 773719)
While I agree that there is nothing to gain by them releasing the photo, the harmful reaction is still a realistic scenario regardless of the photo, burial and so on.

For the record though, I would have liked to see it.

Pictures eventually always seemed to be "leaked" (saddam hanging video). The President certainly doesnt need to release them to prove he's really dead (of course he was killed this week). But I would not be surprised to see them circulate in the future.

Dahoss 05-04-2011 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by somerfrost (Post 773732)
I get it, you feel compelled to disparage anyone you disagree with,

Not at all. It just gets old reading about how great you think you are. Change the record already.

I already know what your smug response is going to be, so save it.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.