What psychobabble term do you use to describe thinking everything is about you??

5th, 6th, 7th and mine is the 8th for us following along

It's not about me. It's about BTW. The only way you can help him (which is your goal...to come to the aid of a Narcissist you like ) is by attacking the messenger who brought the truth. Nobody has attacked the facts. They've attacked the messenger, and that's how people have chosen to reduce the cognitive dissonance that they are finding unpleasant. Look at #3A. IT'S A BOARD FAVORITE. The popular way to diminish an idea is to try to alter it's importance by attacking the person who brought up the idea. That's what BTW did. He admitted he was wrong, but quickly attacked the messenger(FAT MAN,) and changed the subject. Now, all the enablers of BTW have followed his lead by attacking me (the messenger who pointed out the defense mechanism the Narcissist uses) using the technique BTW used in the 1st place (attacking the messenger.)


http://www.rationalrevelation.com/library/cogdis.html

Bump due to specific efforts made to displace attention away from this (by attacking the messenger.) If you'll stop the efforts to distract attention away from the subject, then no bumps.

isnt the subject zenyatta v rail trip?

Yet another way to lessen information you don't like......BTW said he was wrong about Rail Trip, but (because he's a narcissist) had to try to alter the importance of that by attacking FAT MAN. I didn't bring Narcissism in. He displayed it 3 times:

1) Writes "Happy?" after admitting he's wrong...........(Narcissistic Technique.)

2) I was wrong, but you're as miserable as it gets........ (Narcissistic Technique.)

3) Changes subject...........(Narcissistic Technique.)

i have no dog in whatever fight you are trying to have. just trying to get the thread back to what the subject is and its not who is or isnt a narcissist. the subject is zenyatta and rail trip.

scuds vs the world is way more interesting right now.

Maybe... But those horses and their connections had a choice 1) take a shot at Rachel or 2) take a shot at Z.

IF THEY STOP ATTACKING THE MESSENGER, THEN IT'D BE BACK ON WHAT YOU WANT. LOL...Nothing new going on. I just reset it. They keep attacking the messenger in order to try to lessen the importance of something they don't like being talked about. This is what people do when a Narcissist is exposed with facts. They attack the messenger.

Another attack on the messenger. Painting messenger as paranoid etc. Still no attack on the facts brought up.

:wf

Scuds I am on your side of this argument. You seem like a good enough dude.

facts are the facts scuds , i know the deal you feel , if i claim foul when nyra doesn't give a refund over a horse held in the starting gate, it becomes a debate on my assocaition with a former board member instead of a cold hard look at the facts ....ie now instead of looking at the message , the messenger goes on trial , great country isn't it scuds

Scuds I was joking. I waited patiently for you to post, but you are probably too busy finishing up building your last lamp built out of human body parts. I wanted the tenth attacker on scuds to be special. You let me down Dahmer.

Interesting $hit...Who knew...